fbpx
48.4 F
Spokane
Saturday, February 24, 2024
HomeCommentaryShould Cameras Be Allowed in the Kohberger Courtroom?

Should Cameras Be Allowed in the Kohberger Courtroom?

Date:

Related stories

Ask a Baha’i: Would a Christian need to pray to Bahá’u’lláh, not Jesus, if converting to the Baha’i faith?

If I followed the teaching of Baha’i would I need to change my lifelong relationship with Jesus? I wonder how can I, as a lifelong Christian, focus my prayers from Jesus to Bahá’u’lláh?

Muslims Calling for Peace in Gaza Have Been Answered with Rampant Islamophobia

Islamophobia, in other words, does not operate in a vacuum. It creates repercussions far beyond the Muslim community. It’s time our leaders took action. 

Nex Benedict Is Another Matthew Shepard 

On Feb. 7, Nex Benedict, a non-binary Owasso, Oklahoma, teen, was beaten to death in a girl’s restroom at Owasso High School by three older female students. So far, there is no sign the girls responsible have been arrested or even interviewed by police. 

We Have Traditions, Therefore We Are We

During the penultimate week of the month, the staff at the Hearth discusses the next month’s calendar. Staff goes over what events are forthcoming and which classes are going to be taught.

Yes, Contradictions Exist in the Bible, for They Exist in Ourselves

I know that many conservative Christians believe that the Bible tells one big saving story and work hard to harmonize all its smaller stories and its testimonies. I think a harmonized Bible does not do justice to what it has to offer.

Should Cameras Be Allowed in the Kohberger Courtroom?

Bryan Kohberger’s attorneys are asking the Latah County Court to disallow cameras in the courtroom, saying journalists focus too much attention on their client.

I’m sorry, but: Duh. Of course the cameras focus on Kohberger. He is the news. Not the judge, not the attorneys, not the district attorney or the jury (when it comes to trial). Even when a verdict is read, Kohberger is at the center of the news stories.

What makes news? News is defined as containing any or all of the following: proximity, prominence, timeliness, oddity, human interest, scandal, conflict, consequence and impact. In Moscow, this case connects all those dots making it a major news story people want to follow.

Placing cameras in the courtroom is not a new debate, it is something that has stirred controversy for generations. The greatest tension is the defendant’s right to a fair trial versus the public’s right to know. Opponents of cameras claim the mere presence of a camera will change the way some people behave and present themselves on the stand. Defenders say it provides a clear understanding of the court proceedings.

What we learned from the O.J. Simpson courtroom

In a sense, the Kohberger case is like the 1994 O.J. Simpson case: One suspect accused of a heinous murder. In the Simpson case, cameras were allowed in the courtroom and millions of people watched the proceedings. Often, people were stunned by the way a court is conducted, it was a learning experience about the justice system in America.

Like Simpson, Kohberger is presumed innocent until proven guilty, and only a trial can determine his innocence or guilt. Allowing cameras into the courtroom to document the proceedings is not sensational. It is helping citizens better understand the case. In the end, it is a form of closure for the community.

Prior to cameras, newspapers often used sketch artists to show what happened in a court. Frequently, lawyers complained that the artists did not give a true representation of their client. Starting in 1935 with the Lindberg baby kidnapping trial, cameras have been allowed in some courtrooms.

However, the U.S. Supreme Court did overturn a 1965 Texas conviction citing the presence of cameras created bad press for the defendant. This led to a nearly 20-year moratorium on allowing cameras in any courts across America.

Cameras in the courtroom now up to each judge’s discretion

In 1981, the Supreme Court recalibrated and said a total ban on broadcasting trials was not justified, allowing each court to decide about allowing cameras. By the mid-1990s, people could watch some trials, providing a look at how justice is carried out.

Still, the Simpson case was also a backwards step in many legal arenas. The imperfections of the Simpson case influenced many judges to disallow cameras in some high-profile cases, such as the Oklahoma City Bombing trial and the Scott Peterson murder case. Today, judges have the option of allowing cameras in a trial or not.

Watching court proceedings is not like reading mystery fiction for fun. The procedures are often tedious, slow and sometimes it is difficult to follow the logic of the opposing sides. Unless one is a legal expert, key elements can pass by a viewer who may not understand why an argument is important.

Yet, as Americans we have a right to justice and, often, the only way people can see it happen is if a local court will allow cameras into the courtroom for a major case. Yes, one does need to balance the right to a fair trial and due process with the First Amendment and the citizen’s right to public information.

If Kohberger, as the accused, is at the center of the case, any courtroom camera will pay attention to him and his reactions. Whether he likes it or not, he is the center of the news story. That is the nature of news. Looking at the case at hand and comparing it to the elements of what makes news, the Kohberger trial is pretty much a trifecta in terms of news value, justice and people having the right to see it in action.

Becky Tallent
Becky Tallent
An award-winning journalist and public relation professional, Rebecca "Becky" Tallent was a journalism faculty member at the University of Idaho for 13 years before her retirement in 2019. Tallent earned her B.A. and M.Ed. degrees in journalism from the University of Central Oklahoma and her Educational Doctorate in Mass Communications from Oklahoma State University. She is of Cherokee descent and is a member of both the Indigenous Journalists Association and the Society of Professional Journalists. She and her husband, Roger Saunders, live in Moscow, Idaho, with their two cats.

Ad

spot_img
spot_img
spot_img

6 COMMENTS

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tracy Simmons
Admin
5 months ago

Sharing this with my Public Affairs class!

Becky Tallent
Becky Tallent
5 months ago
Reply to  Tracy Simmons

Thank you, Tracy!

Andy Pope
5 months ago

Becky, I’m going to share this on Facebook as well as Twitter. To be honest, I have been in a moral quandary over this issue. I believe freedom of the press is consitutional and in fact guaranteed in the 1st Amendment. Rights to privacy are hazier as to whether they are constitutional, and I am skeptical about arguments as to their guarantee in the 4th Amendment.

However, my moral quandary is another plane. I question anything that feeds our consumer thirst for sensationalism. I even wonder if in this context we are no better off than those who enjoyed the display of gladiators fighting in the Colisseum, often to their death. What is thirsty can quickly become bloodthirsty, and I question why we are indulging that form of public thirst.

That said, since I also have been questioning whether I should be involved in journalism AT ALL lately, I’ll set my unresolved personal dilemma aside for the purpose of sharing a very well-written, thought-provoking piece.

Becky Tallent
Becky Tallent
5 months ago
Reply to  Andy Pope

Hi Andy – It is an interesting question, one that does require a delicate balance. As I said in the piece, this time I think the cameras should be there to help give healing to the community while also providing information to people who want to know the facts as they are presented in court. Thank you so much for the compliment and sharing. 🙂

Andy Pope
5 months ago
Reply to  Becky Tallent

I did grasp your stance in the piece, and I think you presented a healthy balance while at the same time asserting your own position. I just shared your piece on X and Facebook.

Becky Tallent
Becky Tallent
5 months ago
Reply to  Andy Pope

Thank you!

spot_img
6
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x