26.3 F
Spokane
Thursday, February 6, 2025
spot_img
HomeCommentaryAskAsk An Atheist: God and nature

Ask An Atheist: God and nature

Date:

Related stories

Series of home raids lead to 13 arrests of Baha’i women

Iran’s current persecution of Baha’is continues as the government security forces home raids without warrants and arrest Baha’i women. The BIC condemns these arrests and systematic persecution and encourages a review of Iran’s human rights records

Environmentalism unites religious and secular voices to defend Earth’s sacredness

Environmentalism connects faith and reason, urging us to protect Earth’s sacredness. It’s a moral duty, shared by all, to defend our planet against destruction and greed.

Are all really welcome here in my home?

The writer's best friend asked a question after he saw her sign "All Are Welcome Here" in the window. He wanted to know, "Are all welcome?" In this piece, she explains her answer.

Proselytizing: How to avoid it while sharing your ‘good news’

A Catholic contrarian reflects on proselytizing, urging people to share their beliefs with love, humility and respect, avoiding coercion, even when it's talking about a new movie.

Editorial: Why FāVS News’ coverage includes all religious voices, even when readers object

FāVS News' community religious coverage spans all beliefs and traditions in the Inland Northwest, even when controversial. Our mission demands we listen to all voices to build understanding.

Our Sponsors

spot_img

What do you want to ask an Atheist?  Fill out the form below or submit your question online

How can you not believe in God when you see all this intelligence in nature?

By Jim Downard

The are several grand buried assumptions in that question.  The first is, what is meant by “all this intelligence in nature”?  We observe that life replicates and mutates, and that is the driver of natural evolution.  So we may observe that the naturally occurring Alu retrotransposons (parasitical genetic elements that carry a “copy me” signal in their coding) have proliferated in our primate lineage, so that in our case about 10 percent of us is a pile-up of Alu copies (around a million and a half and growing).  Was any of that intentional?  If all of it were intentional, that is awkward, since when occasionally Alus mutate and add a “read me” signal that causes their activation, the effects are usually bad (screwing up protein folding, for example).

Though once in awhile, luck of the draw, some effects turned out to be beneficial, and chunks of our brain systems now draw on elements contributed by those pesky Alus.  But there’s no need to attribute any of the Alus (good or bad) to purpose, they just are, doing their thing in the busy surging dynamic exchanges that is our biology.  Those who seek to see “intelligence in nature” may not have looked as close at the nature as they should have.

Which brings us to the second buried assumption in the question.  Which “God” did they have in mind?  Remember, whichever deity they embrace, most of the people on Earth don’t currently share it, and never have.  Every version is a temporary minority belief (even if in, say, the case of Christianity, you get a sizable 2.6 billion minority if you lump all Christians together as a bloc, even if they aren’t always willing to do so themselves).

So how do you distinguish the handiwork of a purported deity in the past or currently?  There are no designer labels in the biology to help, and there’s another snag: no religion had ever laid out an explanatory narrative of the past that even remotely matches up with what we’ve determined by science.  Religions easily had the earth as flat (took a while for the Greeks to popularize a spherical one, and got folded into Christian lore), occasionally some had durations in the billions of years (like the Hindus, who invented zero in math and got carried away with it), but just as hyperbole, not historical reality.

No religion described a cosmos starting out only as stars lacking solar systems, going through multiple supernova cycles to spread the raw materials for our generation of stars with planetary systems, or that when life appeared here, it was exclusively bacterial, taking billions of years before colonizing the land, and along the way manifesting no bee-line rush to get to humans who could build cathedrals to specific gods.

That mismatch between the religious baggage and the observable science is a major problem for those wishing to shoehorn in their parochial “God” of choice, to the exclusion of all others, as if the sacred texts had clearly and uniquely explained things in a way showing the author had access to the full factual skivvy.

And of course the “natural theology” approach to verifying particular gods, not be defending their overall content, but by trying to end-run with allusions to the wonders of nature (without necessarily studying it closely) doesn’t make the moral theodicy problems go away.  Religions have a questionable track record on human rights issues, from the treatment of women to their willingness to go along with slavery.  None of that historical reality goes away, however much “intelligence” one tries to tease out (selectively) from the nature kit.

Jim Downard
Jim Downard
Jim Downard is a Spokane native (with a sojourn in Southern California back in the early 1960s) who was raised in a secular family, so says had no personal faith to lose. He's always been a history and science buff (getting a bachelor's in the former area at what was then Eastern Washington University in the early 1970s).

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x