69.6 F
Spokane
Thursday, May 1, 2025
HomeCommentaryAsk An Atheist: Would the world be better off without religion?

Ask An Atheist: Would the world be better off without religion?

Date:

spot_img

Related stories

Trump turns America into ‘It’s a Wonderful Life’ Pottersville

Juggling fiction and facts, the author compares Trump 2.0’s America to Pottersville in "It's a Wonderful Life" warning Trump's version is not so wonderful.

Christian support for historical censorship betrays biblical values

Trump’s orders censor history, erasing injustice and sin — betraying both education’s purpose and core Christian values of repentance.

‘Is God real’ arguments distract us from truth

Arguments for God's existence breed endless counters. So, without evidence or clarity, belief becomes imagination, not truth-seeking.

Think the Old Testament is outdated think again

The Old Testament still holds deep relevance — its laws, stories, and details reveal God's timeless wisdom when seen in proper context.

Idaho twins honor Pope Francis with the values he held so dear

Idaho twins, growing up in the Catholic faith, honor Pope Francis through their faith, service and love for their Catholic community.

Our Sponsors

spot_img

What do you want to Ask an Atheist? Submit your questions online or fill out the form below.

By Jim Downard

Do you believe the world would be better off without religion?

SPO_House-ad_Ask-an-atheist_0425133Religions occur naturally in human beings.  The specific doctrines of religions are cultural and vary over time, of course, but that humans make religion (along supernaturalist and superstition thinking too) is not something that can be prevented or abolished.  We humans make such things along with the process of making (inventing) sense of the world.  So there is no way for religion to disappear because it comes from the way our brains function.

 

Would Bach have ever written his music in the way he did if he weren’t religious?  Probably not.  Likewise Brahms might not have written his music in the way he did had he been religious.  It takes all kinds.

 

Now I will say that the world would definitely be better off if no religion can ever enforce its orthodoxy by marshalling the powers of the state, or the coercive powers of its social network.  People should only believe a religion because they personally choose to do so, not because they get into serious trouble if they don’t.  That secular protections aspect is definitely dooble, and highly desirable.

 

Just how many people would remain religious or what forms such religions would take in the absence of state protection remains to be seen.  Bereft of its coercive arm, the benign side of religious belief (humanitarian services, inspiration to creativity, providing meaning and purpose for people who might otherwise be a nuisance, etc) can continue, and I have no problem with that.

Jim Downard
Jim Downard
Jim Downard is a Spokane native (with a sojourn in Southern California back in the early 1960s) who was raised in a secular family, so says had no personal faith to lose. He's always been a history and science buff (getting a bachelor's in the former area at what was then Eastern Washington University in the early 1970s).

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img
spot_img

2 COMMENTS

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bardsbrood
Bardsbrood
8 years ago

Thank you for a balanced view, Jim. The problem is, religion is fairly bound up in the social hierarchies. Of course, even without religion social hierarchies causing social injustice still abound. There is a lot to think about.

Brien
Brien
8 years ago

Kudos Jim. You delivered a perfect answer.

spot_img
2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x