31.2 F
Spokane
Monday, February 17, 2025
spot_img
HomeCommentaryAsk An Atheist: Would the world be better off without religion?

Ask An Atheist: Would the world be better off without religion?

Date:

Related stories

How my new puppy teaches me patience in the fight for democracy

Amid overwhelming news and political anger, a rescue puppy teaches the author the power of patience and persistence in the fight for democracy, without letting frustration consume them.

Yes. Separation of church and state is in the Constitution.

Modern politicians say the founders did not include the separation of church and state in the U.S. Constitution. Historians show why that's a not true.

The old man in the mirror just called me ‘kid’

When the author doesn't recognize his aging face in the mirror, he decides to embrace it. He knows aging is a journey of accepting who he is in the moment.

Happy Black History Month?

February has been known as Black History Month since 1976. This year, the month takes more ominous tones in light of Trump administrations war against DEI.

Dreams don’t have to be dreamy to be true

We can romanticize history's dreamy dreamers, but their daily realities were fraught with struggle. This doesn't mean the dreams were wrong, but that they are worth our perserverance.

Our Sponsors

spot_img

What do you want to Ask an Atheist? Submit your questions online or fill out the form below.

By Jim Downard

Do you believe the world would be better off without religion?

SPO_House-ad_Ask-an-atheist_0425133Religions occur naturally in human beings.  The specific doctrines of religions are cultural and vary over time, of course, but that humans make religion (along supernaturalist and superstition thinking too) is not something that can be prevented or abolished.  We humans make such things along with the process of making (inventing) sense of the world.  So there is no way for religion to disappear because it comes from the way our brains function.

 

Would Bach have ever written his music in the way he did if he weren’t religious?  Probably not.  Likewise Brahms might not have written his music in the way he did had he been religious.  It takes all kinds.

 

Now I will say that the world would definitely be better off if no religion can ever enforce its orthodoxy by marshalling the powers of the state, or the coercive powers of its social network.  People should only believe a religion because they personally choose to do so, not because they get into serious trouble if they don’t.  That secular protections aspect is definitely dooble, and highly desirable.

 

Just how many people would remain religious or what forms such religions would take in the absence of state protection remains to be seen.  Bereft of its coercive arm, the benign side of religious belief (humanitarian services, inspiration to creativity, providing meaning and purpose for people who might otherwise be a nuisance, etc) can continue, and I have no problem with that.

Jim Downard
Jim Downard
Jim Downard is a Spokane native (with a sojourn in Southern California back in the early 1960s) who was raised in a secular family, so says had no personal faith to lose. He's always been a history and science buff (getting a bachelor's in the former area at what was then Eastern Washington University in the early 1970s).

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img

2 COMMENTS

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bardsbrood
Bardsbrood
8 years ago

Thank you for a balanced view, Jim. The problem is, religion is fairly bound up in the social hierarchies. Of course, even without religion social hierarchies causing social injustice still abound. There is a lot to think about.

Brien
Brien
8 years ago

Kudos Jim. You delivered a perfect answer.

2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x