51.2 F
Spokane
Wednesday, April 16, 2025
spot_img
HomeCommentaryAmerican History: Religious Intolerance, Part 4

American History: Religious Intolerance, Part 4

Date:

spot_img

Related stories

Encounter grace in the cross and empty tomb this Holy Week

This Holy Week, learn how to encounter grace through Christ’s suffering on the cross and redemption as he resurrects from the dead, leaving an empty tomb.

Jesus and the power of storytelling come alive during Holy Week

Learn how storytelling connects us to Jesus, Holy Week and each other, inviting deeper faith, healing, imagination and shared community.

At St. Gertrude the Paschal flame ignites a deeper faith

At St. Gertrude, Holy Week and Benedictine vows mirror Christ’s love, sacrifice and resurrection through rich, symbolic rituals.

Let our better ‘ships’ rise with us

Greed sank great ships of bipartisan-ship, citizen-ship and others. With courage, we can raise them and sail toward something better and rise again!

Sociologist’s new book explains why organized religion has lost relevancy

Organized religion isn't just declining. It has become culturally obsolete. So says Christian Smith in his newest book, "Why Religion Went Obsolete: The Demise of Traditional Faith in America."

Our Sponsors

spot_img

By Brien Pittman

Read part 3

Our Founding Fathers’ Beautiful Attempt at Religious Freedom and Tolerance

constitution

In 1787, when Madison attended the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, he wanted Jefferson’s plan for the separation of church and state to become the law of the land. And as framed in Philadelphia that year, the U.S. Constitution clearly stated in Article VI that federal elective and appointed officials “shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution, but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”

This passage — along with the facts that the Constitution does not mention God or a deity (except for a pro forma “year of our Lord” date) and that its very first amendment forbids Congress from making laws that would infringe of the free exercise of religion — attests to the founders’ resolve that America be a secular republic. The men who fought the Revolution may have thanked Providence and attended church regularly — or not. But they also fought a war against a country in which the head of state was the head of the church. Knowing well the history of religious warfare that led to America’s settlement, they clearly understood both the dangers of that system and of sectarian conflict.

It was the recognition of that divisive past by the founders — notably Washington, Jefferson, Adams and Madison — that secured America as a secular republic. As president, Washington wrote in 1790: “All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunity of citizenship. …For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens.”

He was addressing the members of America’s oldest synagogue, the Touro Synagogue in Newport, Rhode Island (where his letter is read aloud every August). In closing, he wrote specifically to the Jews a phrase that applies to Muslims as well: “May the children of the Stock of Abraham, who dwell in this land, continue to merit and enjoy the good will of the other inhabitants, while every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and figtree, and there shall be none to make him afraid.”

As for Adams and Jefferson, they would disagree vehemently over policy, but on the question of religious freedom they were united. “In their seventies,” Jacoby writes, “with a friendship that had survived serious political conflicts, Adams and Jefferson could look back with satisfaction on what they both considered their greatest achievement— their role in establishing a secular government whose legislators would never be required, or permitted, to rule on the legality of theological views.”

Comments?

Brien Pittman
Brien Pittman
Brien’s articles for FāVS generally revolve around ideas and beliefs that create unhealthy deadlock divisions between groups. He has received (minor) writing awards for his short stories and poetry from the cities of Portland, Oregon and the city of (good beer) Sapporo, Japan. In 2010 he was asked to present several articles for the California Senate Committee “Task Force for Suicide Prevention” and has been published by online magazines and a couple national poetry anthologies in print form.

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
spot_img
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x