49 F
Spokane
Thursday, April 3, 2025
spot_img
HomeCommentaryWhat rewinding can teach us about biblical texts

What rewinding can teach us about biblical texts

Date:

spot_img

Related stories

A frozen debit card melts my heart and teaches me kindness

A frozen debit card melts the author's heart replacing her irritation with compassion, teaching her kindness by seeing others as children of God.

‘Cremation of the Century’ celebrates Bali’s rich Hindu culture

The author recalls Bali's "cremation of the century" over 30 years ago he experienced, when Balinese honored their dead, along with a queen from an ancient Hindu kingdom.

A call to national unity: ‘Try to love one another. Right now.’

Classism and inequality are real, but the focus should be on national unity, not dividing by party. We need to work together to address economic struggles.

Multiple cultures clash over the future of the American dream

If the future of the American dream is to survive, her people need to reaquaint themselves with the culture of civility and honesty. Then, they need to clash against disinformation, social media influencers, and more.

Ask an Evangelical: Why did God send Jesus Christ to die for us?

In this Ask an Evangelical column, the reader asks why did God send his son, Jesus, to die for us. This answer centers on blood, perfect sacrifices and the need for atonement.

Our Sponsors

spot_img

[todaysdate]

By Kyle Franklin

The word “rewind” is one of my favorite words. It’s not because of the way it sounds or even that catchy phrase: “Be kind — rewind!” Rewind is one of my favorite words because it is, to me, a great teaching tool.

Rewind, though a term most of us know and remember, is essentially obsolete. With the dominance of CDs and DVDs, audio and video cassettes are now essentially obsolete. While we may say, “rewind that, I missed it,” I hear many more people say, “back it up.”

It seems likely that, in 100 years, the term “rewind” will have fallen out of use and familiarity. If anyone randomly happened upon the term in a book, she or he potentially would need to figure the term out through context or research.

This is just in 100 years. What happens in 2,000 years or more?

The meaning and context of words is paramount to our understanding of Scriptures especially.

An anecdote. Last Easter, a friend of mine took her 5-year-old daughter to Sunday School.  While the teacher was talking about Jesus “rising from the dead,” the little girl innocently asked if Jesus was a zombie. It was not malicious: she was accustomed to hearing her friends talk about zombies, and she had seen them in several different movies and shows on television. The teacher was appalled and, unfortunately, shamed the young girl and ultimately asked the family to visit other churches instead.

The culture in which we live affects the words we use and the meaning of those words.  Further, our culture affects how we interpret and understand words and texts written outside of our time.

 
I am currently reading a book called “Unexpected News: Reading the Bible with Third World Eyes” by Robert McAfee Brown. The author reviews a variety of Gospel texts and explores how they are understood differently in the Third World (specifically Central America) than they are in the United States.

This brings up two questions: first, what does mean that people from different cultures read Scripture in different ways? Second, is it possible that we, 2000+ years after Scripture was written, are reading the texts incorrectly or through ignorant eyes?

Let me respond to my own questions.

First, the fact that we, as people from different cultures, read Scripture in different ways can be attributed to the fact that we have different experiences. Even compared to others in my immediate family, I read the Scriptures very differently. One of my family members recognizes Jesus as a savior, while I see Jesus as an advocate of social justice. Our personal experience dictates how we respond to any text — especially a religious text — and no one can have the exact same experience as another.

Second, we are bound to have a different set of lenses than someone living in the time that scriptural texts were written, 2,000+ years ago. Our different experiences are not limited to modern-day gadgets like technology or cars — back in those times, governmental systems were different, notions of slavery were different, and life in general was different.

I am not claiming that we should dismiss Scriptural texts because they no longer apply to us. I do believe, however, that we should do better to understand how teachings and texts applied to the people at the time they were written. Then, we can work to apply those teachings to our own lives.

“Blessed are the poor…” What does poor mean? Are we poor? Or does poor more likely apply to those in developing countries?

“Blessed are the poor in spirit…” What does poor in spirit mean? Are these the depressed, or those who identify as bipolar?

“Blessed are the pure in heart…” Who are the pure in heart? Are they drug addicts who want to get clean but do not have the power on their own?

There are many ways that we can interpret Scriptural texts — but in doing so, are we empowering the marginalized or are we simply keeping them on the margins?

As people who live within humanity — people of faith or not — we have a responsibility to care for our fellow human. The simple truth is that we cannot sufficiently interpret scriptural texts, because we did not live during the time they were written. However, we can take what was written and choose to live our best as a result.
Kyle Franklin
Kyle Franklin
Kyle A. Franklin is a recent graduate of Gonzaga University, where he earned his Master's in Religious Studies. He completed his bachelor's degree in history and religion at Pacific Lutheran University in 2007 and has worked in both the ELCA Lutheran Church and the United Methodist Church.

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img
spot_img

1 COMMENT

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jan Shannon
10 years ago

Kyle, you’re right…the best we can do is the best we can do. To understand and to behave. Well said.

spot_img
1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x