SYRACUSE, N.Y. — Lots of rock stars expect cushy perks at the venues where they perform. Requests can include special food and drink, music, video games and even a puppy to play fetch.
For the Dalai Lama, it’s all about the oversized chair.
Syracuse University requested the special seating for the spiritual leader of Tibet who spoke on campus Monday (Oct. 8), and it’s obvious he enjoyed the spacious accommodations.
As he should. The red leather and wood Stickley chair was made especially for him — three times.
Aminy I. Audi, president and CEO of the Fayetteville, N.Y.-based furniture company, explained that the first “Dalai Lama chair” was commissioned for a visit by the Buddhist leader to the University of Buffalo in 2006. Colgate University commissioned a copy of the same chair for a visit there in 2008.
Syracuse called Stickley recently to borrow the third, a copy from The Stickley Museum in Fayetteville for this visit, Audi said.
The chair is an oversized version of Stickley’s classic Eastwood chair, designed by Gustav Stickley.
“It’s an exquisite example of craftsmanship,” Audi said.
The University of Buffalo originally asked that the chair be enlarged to allow the Dalai Lama to pull his legs up and sit cross-legged, a position he prefers, Audi said. Moments after taking the stage Monday, that’s exactly what he did — untying his brown shoes and tucking his legs up under his red and yellow robes. He did the same thing for the afternoon panel and sat that way for all of both sessions. A Stickley moving van was parked behind the Schine Student Center late Monday to take the Dalai Lama chair back to The Stickley Museum.
The Colgate chair was originally auctioned for $25,000, but the donor gave it back to the school, Audi said. The University of Buffalo chair remains on the UB campus.
You may purchase your own custom-made Dalai Lama chair — made of quarter-sewn white oak and a carefully selected hue of red leather, Audi said. The price tag is $8,000.
(Emily Kulkus writes for The Post-Standard in Syracuse, N.Y.)
I wasn’t sure if this was jest or real at the end.
This type of thing would be lambasted to no end if it was a fundamentalist or another high profile religious type in my experience. It seems these types of displays are particularly odious to emerging generations, so why is this example seem to slip by that critique? I’m not opposed to fine crafted work but from my respective this seems like more than a seat that would accommodate a certain type of sitting. If I tried this at my church….I’d clear out most folk fairly quick.