The poster for “Noah” the movie. Photo courtesy of Grace Hill Media
This image is available for Web and print publication. For questions, contact Sally Morrow.
NEW YORK (RNS) In recent years, Hollywood has made a concerted effort to lure religious audiences to the local cineplex with such films as “The Passion of the Christ,” “Son of God” and even dark-horse hits like “Facing the Giants.” And most of the time, it’s worked.
But the upcoming Russell Crowe film “Noah” is stirring different emotions — even concern — as it touches on a beloved Bible story near and dear to people of several faiths.
Before its world premiere in Mexico City on Monday (March 10), director Darren Aronofsky told the audience to expect the unexpected. “It’s a very, very different movie,” he said. “Anything you’re expecting, you’re f—ing wrong.”
He’s also called “Noah” “the least biblical biblical film ever made.” The $130 million film opens in theaters on March 28 and stars Crowe, Emma Watson, Jennifer Connelly and Anthony Hopkins.
Despite outreach to pastors and even Pope Francis to screen the film, the National Religious Broadcasters suggested it couldn’t support Aronofsky’s film unless Paramount included a disclaimer that the movie was “inspired by” the story of Noah rather than be seen as literal scripture.
The story of Noah is told in the early chapters of Genesis, not long after the well-known tale of Adam and Eve. Noah was a speck of righteousness in a global sea of iniquity, Genesis says, and God commanded him to build the ark to save his family and the animals from a destructive flood.
The animals boarded the ark two-by-two, the rain fell … and fell … and fell … for 40 days and nights. A year later, Noah and his menagerie exited on dry land — middle-aged at 651, according to Genesis. Many recountings leave out the time, after the flood, when Noah passed out naked and drunk inside a tent. According to the Bible, he lived until the ripe age of 950.
Despite its overtones of death and destruction, the flood story has given birth to rainbows, countless Sunday school lessons, nursery decorations and Fisher Price toys. The name “Noah” has scored in the top 10 most popular names for newborn boys since 2009, according to the Social Security Administration.
The biblical narrative of the flood is a touchstone in many religious circles, a story that’s told and retold within Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Advocates for creationism and environmentalism draw on the story of Noah for their causes. Even Harold Camping, the discredited evangelist who preached that the world would end in 2011, calculated his doomsday predictions based on when he thought Noah entered the ark.
So what makes the simple story of Noah so popular? Joseph Blenkinsopp, a professor emeritus at the University of Notre Dame who has studied Noah, thinks it’s because more people are aware of global disasters.
“For Jews and Christians, and possibly Muslims, it’s a sign of judgment, that judgment is real and there will be judgment,” Blenkinsopp said. “The flood story was a symbolic representation of that judgment.”
The story of Noah and the Ark as it appeared on the cover of the first album in a collection of 16 dramatized Bible stories released by the Library of Sound Education Inc. This illustration is one of eight done by famed American artist Steele Savage. Religion News Service file photo
This image is available for Web and print publication. For questions, contact Sally Morrow.
The story of Noah also resonates with people looking for a second chance, said Rabbi Scott Perlo of Washington’s Sixth & I Historic Synagogue.
“There’s a desire in each of us to have the past wiped away and to let things come back to a place where they’re completely clean,” he said. “But there’s also a fear because it could mean our own destruction.”
In Judaism, the story of Noah generated the 7 Laws of Noah, laws for basic human morality that non-Jews were bound to observe, such as prohibiting murder or theft. (There’s even a small religious sect, the Noahides, who follow the laws.)
“The Noah story is the birth of the idea of universal morality, that everyone should be moral,” Perlo said. “Noah’s ark is about how goodness survives, even after things go bad, good things can come again.”
Robert Gregg, a religious studies professor at Stanford University, has studied how different faiths tell the same story. In the Quran, he said, the emphasis is less on the ark and the animals and more on Noah’s relationship to the people who didn’t believe him that a flood was coming.
Russell Crowe (foreground) plays the title character in “Noah,” from Paramount Pictures and Regency Enterprises. Photo by Niko Tavernise, courtesy of Grace Hill Media
This image is available for Web and print publication. For questions, contact Sally Morrow.
“The repeated motif is that Noah was told: ‘You’re only a man, you’re not a god. If we get spoken to by God, we expect an angel,’” he said. “It’s about a prophet who goes unheeded.”
Because of Islamic prohibitions on physical depictions of the prophets, three Arab countries have banned the “Noah” film, and several other countries are expected to follow suit.
For Christians, the story of Noah is often used as a story that ultimately points to the story of Jesus, according to Carol Kaminski, an Old Testament professor at Gordon-Conwell Seminary whose research focuses on Noah.
She argues that Noah isn’t saved by his own goodness or obedience but rather God’s divine favor and grace.
“It’s not about the good people inside the ark and the bad people outside of it. It’s not about God starting afresh, since he keeps the world going with the same people,” Kaminski said.
“It is a story of judgment against sin and a plan of redemption, and grace frames the narrative.”
KRE/MG END BAILEY
The post ‘Noah’ film sparks debate over one of the world’s oldest and most beloved stories appeared first on Religion News Service.
Judging from some of the clips I’ve caught of the new film, it draws on the “fountains of the deep” reference to have spurts of water shooting from the ground, but flashing meteors seem another non-scriptural bit. And unless there are some dinosaurs on board, it won’t pass muster for Young Earth Creationists.
Any attempt to particularize the story can go with a human interest angle independently of whether the creators believe there really was a flood like that, of course. To the extent that it gets people thinking about the plausibility of any global inundation it may backfire as an apologetic tool, but I assume Parmount pictures is concerned less with the reality of two-by-two (actually seven pairs of “clean animals” were required, two for unclean) than with bottom line profit.