fbpx
33.2 F
Spokane
Monday, November 18, 2024
spot_img
HomeCommentaryBlogsThe Resurrection Series Part 12 - 1 Corinthians 15

The Resurrection Series Part 12 – 1 Corinthians 15

Date:

Related stories

Shifting from shock and disillusionment to a more realistic hope after Trump’s election victory

Commentary writer Sarah Henn Hayward comes to terms with the election results by processing her shock and fears, eventually seeing a possible way forward.

Trump’s reelection forces us to confront absurdity and embrace tolerance

Dive into a discussion on tolerance and absurdity in the context of recent political events. Discover how our perception of the world can be turned upside down.

Finding wisdom in foolishness

Delve into the world of fools, philosophers and kings and how Janet Marugg learned from their stories sometimes fools can be wise.

Where does my help come from?

Find inspiration and comfort in the words of Psalm 121:1-2. Discover the source of help and support in your life.

Poem: The Great Letting Go

Experience the beauty of letting go in nature's autumn display. A poem by Christi Ortiz celebrating the vivid colors and graceful transition of the season.

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img

[todaysdate]

By Corbin Croy

Now, brothers, I want to remind you of the gospel I preached to you, which you received and on which you have taken your stand. By this gospel you are saved, if you hold firmly to the word I preached to you. Otherwise, you have believed in vain. For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Peter, and then to the Twelve. After that, he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers at the same time, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep. Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles, and last of all he appeared to me also, as to one abnormally born. For I am the least of the apostles and do not even deserve to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God. But by the grace of God I am what I am, and his grace to me was not without effect. No, I worked harder than all of them–yet not I, but the grace of God that was with me. Whether, then, it was I or they, this is what we preach, and this is what you believed. – 1 Corinthians 15:1-11

This gives us the earliest record of resurrection belief. The passage between 3-8 are structured in what has come to be called a “creedal form.” For us, it would be like a pledge or oath that is structured for easy memory to be repeated, like a motto. So the existence of these creedal forms is very important in understanding the resurrection, because we can be fairly sure that a creedal form existed for some time before we have record of it, just as we know that the pledge of allegiance has existed for quite some time.

What are the details, or facts, listed from this creedal confession?

  1. Christ died
  2. for our sins
  3. according to the Scriptures
  4. he was buried
  5. was raised
  6. on the third day
  7. appeared to Peter
  8. appeared to the 12 
  9. appeared to 500+ at the same time
  10. appeared to James
  11. appeared to the apostles
  12. appeared to Paul.

Now most of these facts are generally accepted, or considered non-debatable. Christ dying for our sins is a great piece of information once we believe that he died and rose again, but it is not worth debating about. This creedal form notes that Christ was buried, but it does not say that he was buried in a Tomb. It says he was raised, but it does not say that he rose from his burial location. Fact three has many various applications. It could mean that Jesus followed a script, or it could mean that we can see the Scriptures through his resurrection. Since, Paul does not list any specific scriptures which Jesus “fulfilled” it is hard to accept the first proposition on a prima facie basis. Fact 6 is a highly debated proposition that Christ rose on the third day. The debate centers on whether or not this term is of theological inflection or of historical facticity. Speaking of the “third day” could be just as theological a term as Christ “dying for our sins.” Numerology and Chronology were methods of alluding to theological concepts in Jewish literature. So at best we need to put a pin in this and not make a biased assumption. The appearances seems mixed. It seems like there were two lists of appearances that may have each been a part of similar creedal forms that got combined into one creedal form. Perhaps one list simply named, “Peter, James, and Paul” and another list named “the Twelve, the apostles, and 500+ at the same time.” Otherwise, it seems weird that Peter would be included as separate from the Twelve, and James would be excluded from the apostles. What is most important about these appearances is that Paul makes no mention of their being physical manifestations of Jesus. His vision of light is equaled to the other appearances of Jesus.

Now this is a hard reality to face, but for the readers of 1 Corinthians 15 it has to be recognized that there is no historical data to suggest that when they read this that they would have any other concept in their mind for these “appearances” to mean anything other then what we know was Paul’s appearance. Paul’s appearance is the only historically recorded autobiographical account of what a “post-mortem” Jesus appearance was like.

But if it is preached that Christ has been raised from the dead, how can some of you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? If there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised. And if Christ has not been raised, our preaching is useless and so is your faith. More than that, we are then found to be false witnesses about God, for we have testified about God that he raised Christ from the dead. But he did not raise him if in fact the dead are not raised. For if the dead are not raised, then Christ has not been raised either. And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins. Then those also who have fallen asleep in Christ are lost. If only for this life we have hope in Christ, we are to be pitied more than all men. But Christ has indeed been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep. For since death came through a man, the resurrection of the dead comes also through a man. For as in Adam all die, so in Christ all will be made alive. But each in his own turn: Christ, the firstfruits; then, when he comes, those who belong to him. Then the end will come, when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father after he has destroyed all dominion, authority and power. – 1 Corinthians 15:12-24

I hear this a lot from my believing friends that if there is no resurrection then we are to be pitied above all men. The problem is that I agree with them. They think that they are using Paul to prove to me that the resurrection happened. They think that I am some resurrection denier, but this is a misunderstanding of my position. I affirm with all my heart that the resurrection of Jesus Christ happened. The difference is that my belief in the resurrection looks different then theirs.

What I find important about this passage is that it illustrates the translative properties I mentioned earlier in conceiving of the possibility for a spiritual resurrection. Here in the pages of Scripture Paul confirms for us that Christ’s resurrection is a translational property which correlates to our own resurrection. Thus, as Christ is raised so too shall we be raised. This property is just as important as the resurrection itself, according to Paul, because the reason why we would be pitied is because if Christ has not been raised then neither shall we. Thus, Christ’s resurrection translates to our own.

But someone may ask, “How are the dead raised? With what kind of body will they come?” How foolish! What you sow does not come to life unless it dies. When you sow, you do not plant the body that will be, but just a seed, perhaps of wheat or of something else. But God gives it a body as he has determined, and to each kind of seed he gives its own body. All flesh is not the same: Men have one kind of flesh, animals have another, birds another and fish another. There are also heavenly bodies and there are earthly bodies; but the splendor of the heavenly bodies is one kind, and the splendor of the earthly bodies is another. The sun has one kind of splendor, the moon another and the stars another; and star differs from star in splendor. So will it be with the resurrection of the dead. The body that is sown is perishable, it is raised imperishable; it is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power; it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body. If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual body. So it is written: “The first man Adam became a living being”; the last Adam, a life-giving spirit. The spiritual did not come first, but the natural, and after that the spiritual. The first man was of the dust of the earth, the second man from heaven. As was the earthly man, so are those who are of the earth; and as is the man from heaven, so also are those who are of heaven. And just as we have borne the likeness of the earthly man, so shall we bear the likeness of the man from heaven. I declare to you, brothers, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God, nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable. – 1 Corinthians 15:35-50

This ends it for me, really. What other evidence do you need? In the pages of Scripture Paul teaches that we will be raised spiritually, our bodies will perish, and our spiritual selves will rise to be with God. “Flesh and blood” cannot inherit the Kingdom of God. The body is a seed. It is buried and a plant grows from it, but the seed stays in the ground. That is the metaphor that Paul is using. The splendor of our resurrection bodies will be of a different *kind* then the splendor of our natural bodies. “It is raised a spiritual body.” Paul clearly makes the distinction between spirit and flesh in this passage and it has to be concluded that our spiritual bodies will not possess flesh of any kind. Paul believed this, and this is most important to understand… He believed this AFTER having Christ “appeared” to him.

It has to be concluded from this passage, at the very least, that a post-mortem appearance does not guarantee a physically-regenerated historically factual account of a resurrection experience. It does make a good case for the spiritual resurrection model, and it does give us a hint as to how the spiritual resurrection model can overcome its one big obstacle. Paul speaks of it at the beginning of this chapter. Paul calls it “the Gospel.”

 



blog comments powered by Disqus

Corbin Croy
Corbin Croy
Corbin Croy was born in Spokane and grew up in Post Falls. In 1998 he got married at the age of 18 and moved to Coeur d’Alene. Together they have four children, and try to live as simply and honestly as possible.

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img

7 COMMENTS

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
bruce
bruce
9 years ago

Corbin, I’m interested in your thoughts on the issue of the historical Jesus actually being taken down from the cross. The Gospel writers assume that the purpose of crucifixion was execution, and that after Jesus was dead, it was time to take him down and bury him. But the Romans seem to have a different purpose, more like that of a billboard than capital punishment. (This is what happens when you rebel against the Romans). Victims were put up on the cross alive more because many of the Romans (such as Pontius Pilate) were so cruel. For example, Julius Caesar, known for his clemency, put criminals to death before putting them up on the cross. Then he would include a sign, much like what was done with Jesus (King of the Jews), so that those passing by could take warning of what the criminal had down and why the individual had been executed. If they were taken down at all, it was at least weeks or months later. But note that the purpose of the cross in this case was not for execution, but for propaganda.
If Jesus was indeed taken down just hours after being put up, then what is the need for a sign? Why put him up on the cross at all? Certainly the Romans had more expedient methods of torture and capital punishment? Why waste the energy on a criminal to take him down and bury him? This was a walking society, and it would possibly takes months for many to have a chance to pass by the area. How would anyone know to take warning if there was just an empty cross with a sign?
I appreciate your research on the burial and am interested if you think the historical Jesus might have actually been left up on the cross for much longer than is accounted for in the Gospels.

Tom Schmidt
Tom Schmidt
9 years ago
Reply to  bruce

I completely agree. Of course, anything could have happened within the reasons of physical possibility, but there is a most likely narrative, the most usual treatment of the crucified. It was a common form of execution, and for the Romans, was for propaganda: don’t do what he did of this could be you. There were few graves, especially for the destitute, of which Jesus was one. We have no evidence of a Joseph of Aramathea. Everyone scattered in the evening, and most likely the women with them; they had no power to ask the soldiers or rulers anything. Most likely he was left hanging until his corpse fell, then the dogs got him

bruce
bruce
9 years ago
Reply to  Tom Schmidt

Thanks for your insights!

Tom Schmidt
Tom Schmidt
9 years ago
Reply to  bruce

Well, I do treat my dogs a bit better!

Corbin
Corbin
9 years ago
Reply to  bruce

Good points. Mark informs us that all of Jesus’ disciples abandoned him at the time of his arrest. There is very little historical credence that can be given to the testimony beyond this point. It is doubtful Jesus had a grave. It is doubtful anyone knew where it was. I see no reason to think that what the general customs of the time were to be in conflict with the idea that Jesus was given New Life. I think it is plausible that Jesus had a normal crucifixion and was thrown in a common grave that most criminals were thrown into.

My best guess would be that the Gospel narratives were constructed around the general customs of the time to emphasize their own theological bias. For them arranging the details to make sense as a historical event was not too important, if you ask me, but telling a story to relate how Jesus is the Son of God.

bruce
bruce
9 years ago
Reply to  Corbin

Thanks!

trackback

[…] [ad_1] During this time of the year, the world celebrates the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Around t… Magdalene and Mary went to the gravesite, the angels outside His tomb proudly declared those words […]

7
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x