70.1 F
Spokane
Friday, May 2, 2025
HomeCommentaryThe intent of the Founding Fathers and the dangers of socialism, part...

The intent of the Founding Fathers and the dangers of socialism, part 2

Date:

spot_img

Related stories

Hey, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., I am autistic and I am OK

Read the poet's response to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s recent comments on autism. The writer shares how discovering he was autistic later in life made his past make much more sense.

Trump turns America into ‘It’s a Wonderful Life’ Pottersville

Juggling fiction and facts, the author compares Trump 2.0’s America to Pottersville in "It's a Wonderful Life" warning Trump's version is not so wonderful.

Christian support for historical censorship betrays biblical values

Trump’s orders censor history, erasing injustice and sin — betraying both education’s purpose and core Christian values of repentance.

‘Is God real’ arguments distract us from truth

Arguments for God's existence breed endless counters. So, without evidence or clarity, belief becomes imagination, not truth-seeking.

Think the Old Testament is outdated think again

The Old Testament still holds deep relevance — its laws, stories, and details reveal God's timeless wisdom when seen in proper context.

Our Sponsors

spot_img

This is the second in a two-part series.

The Founding Fathers were well read in the areas of economics, political separation of powers, and the rule of law with an in-depth knowledge of history. Understanding their background may be why W.C. Skousen in “The Five Thousand Year Leap” commented,

The American Founders recognized that the moment government is authorized to start leveling the material possessions of the rich in order to have an ‘equal distribution of goods,’ the government thereafter has the power to deprive ANY of the people of their ‘equal’ rights to enjoy their lives, liberties, and property. 

To prevent redistribution of goods from occurring, the Founding Fathers created a limited government with minimal regulations, stressing the importance of the right of private property. They understood it was the individual’s right to acquire and possess property, and that private property and liberty were inseparable. When the government confiscates through illegitimate means private property, the fruit of intellectual or physical labor, it enslaves and denies liberty.

The system of private property is the most important guarantee of freedom, both for those who have property and those who do not. Private property divides the means of production among many people acting independently, ensuring that no one person has complete control over everyone. If the means of production were invested in the hands of “society as a whole” or a dictator, whoever exercises the control has complete power over people. The principle of private property for the Founding Fathers was imperative to prevent the slide into socialism, which had been earlier tried in the Plymouth Colony under William Bradford and abandoned as counterproductive to individual freedom and liberty.

To understand the danger socialism presents for people, one needs to know what socialism is.  The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language defines socialism as, “any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.” 

Ayn Rand said:

Socialism is the doctrine that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that his life and his work do not belong to him, but belong to society, that the only justification of his existence is his service to society, and that society may dispose of him in any way it pleases for the sake of whatever it deems to be its own tribal, collective good.  The essential characteristic of socialism is the denial of individual property rights… To deny property rights means to turn men into property owned by the state. Whoever claims the “right” to “redistribute” the wealth produced by others is claiming the “right” to treat human beings as chattel.  

Does socialism sound like what the Founding Fathers intended?

Classical socialism seeks social justice, greater equality and security.  People can agree that they are important issues. The question is, “How does socialism plan to achieve the goals of social justice, greater equality, and security?”  When the individual purposes to be just and treat others equally, he does willingly and from his own resources. What if the government, “to redistribute the wealth,” forces him to act in a way that harms him; does forceful redistribution appear just and right?

Mark Hudson
Mark Hudsonhttp://www.mlcconline.org
Mark Hudson has been pastor of Medical Lake Community Church since 2001. Before that he served as a missionary in Germany, where he spent a decade planting churches.

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
spot_img
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x