fbpx
30.2 F
Spokane
Tuesday, January 21, 2025
spot_img
HomeCommentarySpokane leaders discuss gay marriage

Spokane leaders discuss gay marriage

Date:

Related stories

Martin Luther King Jr.’s hope for justice resonates across time

Martin Luther King Jr. said, “We must accept finite disappointment, but never lose infinite hope.” Read how columnist Sarah Haug relates to these words today.

Dr. King’s dream inspires me to confront family prejudice with hope

A family prejudice leads to an estranged relationship. Why? The author's sexuality. Read how her story reminds her of Dr. King's dream. Despite rejection, she chose love, hope and authenticity.

Martin Luther King Jr.’s Unlikely Stand on Palestine if He Had Lived

If Martin Luther King Jr. lived long enough to see the suffering of Palestinians, he would have joined the call for justice for the Palestinians in their own land.

A lifetime of friendship built on common values and uncommon experiences

A lifetime of friendship spans 80 years as two nonagenarians share their journey from childhood neighbors to biweekly chats, navigating careers in law, ministry, ecology, and teaching across continents.

India’s Dalits suffer unrelentless oppression and violence

Learn about the global oppression and violence suffered by Indian Dalits and how their treatment calls for MLK's solutions for justice.

Our Sponsors

spot_img
Same-sex wedding
Same-sex wedding

This week Rotary Club 21 in downtown Spokane hosted a “leadership dialogue” featuring Bishop Blase Cupich, of the Catholic Diocese of Spokane and Spokane City Councilman Jon Snyder. The topic was referendum 74 dealing with marriage equality.

Snyder, married 15 years to Heidi, was raised with his sister in a gay household. He supports Referendum 74 because he believes the heart of marriage to be about love, commitment and responsibility and that everyone should be able to participate.

Cupich, raised in a family of nine, believes that redefining marriage will not be good for society. His view is that the law would grant exclusive rights to “relationships” and would challenge the norm of how children learn about gender roles.

Snyder made good points supporting the freedom to marry, eliminating the discrimination that exists against gay couples. He commented,” marriage makes relationships stronger why exclude people from that?” His final statement, referring to difference between marriage and civil union was, “if we call it something different it will be something different.”

Cupich’s final comment was about the law’s effect on the complementary nature of sexes and that the law would fundamentally change the “benchmark” that is marriage.

I didn’t hear anything new in this dialogue, it was a very civil discussion and I think many people wanted to make comments but the format didn’t allow anything but questions from audience. One of these questions prompted Cupich to agree that the law might eliminate some discrimination against gay couples. I think Snyder made a good case for eliminating the exclusion of gay people from marriage and Cupich made a strong argument that redefining marriage would open up many new problems related to this law. I think as a Christian, I must always rely on the great command of Deuteronomy 6:5, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your might.” Also from Matthew 22:39 we hear Jesus say,” And a second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”

How can I love my neighbor and exclude them from marriage which has benefited me for last 32 years?

Alan Eschenbacher
Alan Eschenbacherhttp://www.allsaintsgather.com
The Rev. Alan B. Eschenbacher serves as pastor of All Saints Lutheran Church.

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img

1 COMMENT

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Eric Blauer
12 years ago

Any further thoughts to either concluding remarks Alan?

1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x