47.4 F
Spokane
Monday, April 28, 2025
spot_img
HomeNewsLawyers of church shooter argue federal death penalty unconstitutional

Lawyers of church shooter argue federal death penalty unconstitutional

Date:

spot_img

Related stories

Gender non-conforming individuals in Spokane feel burned by Christians

Despite Christianity's stability in the U.S., most gender non-conforming Americans including those in Washington reject it — citing exclusion, trauma and anti-trans rhetoric.

Pasco couple fondly remembers blessing from Pope Francis

Pasco couple had their marriage blessed by Pope Francis last November. He gave them marriage advice, blessed their rosaries and made them laugh.

Idaho Catholic youth lament Pope Francis’ passing

Catholic students mourn Pope Francis, their first pope, while learning about his legacy and the sacred transition to a new church leader.

Washington Governor may reinstate clergy as mandatory child abuse reporters — no exemptions

WA’s SB 5375 adds clergy as mandatory child abuse reporters — even for confessions. Survivors await Gov. Ferguson’s signature by May 15.

FāVS Religion News Roundup: April 25

Holocaust observance draws hundreds, Spokan libraries honor national Arab American Heritage Month, Seattle police accused of using alleged excessive force against two Black Muslim women and more in this week's FāVS Religion News Roundup.

Our Sponsors

spot_img

(Reuters) – Attorneys for a white man accused of killing nine black parishioners in a racially motivated attack at a South Carolina church a year ago argued that their client should not face the death penalty, asserting the punishment is unconstitutional.

Federal prosecutors are seeking the death penalty against Dylann Roof, 22, who is accused of opening fire on a Bible study session at Charleston’s historic Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church on June 17, 2015.

The shooting shook the country and intensified debate over U.S. race relations, which were already roiled by numerous high-profile police killings of unarmed black people.

Attorneys for Roof argued in a document filed in a U.S. District Court in South Carolina on Monday that the federal death penalty is “cruel and unusual punishment” and, as a result, violates the U.S. Constitution.

“No one can be lawfully sentenced to death or executed under it, no matter what his crimes,” the attorneys wrote in the motion.

A court ruling that the Federal Death Penalty Act is unconstitutional would allow Roof to plead guilty and proceed to the sentencing phase of his case in which he could be to life in prison without parole, his attorneys said.

In an earlier court filing, federal prosecutors cited a number of factors for seeking the death penalty, saying Roof singled out victims who were black and elderly, and showed no remorse. They also cited “substantial planning and premeditation.”

The argument that the death penalty is unconstitutional is a typical line of defense. The federal trial against Roof is set to begin on Nov. 7.

Federal death sentences are rarely carried out in the United States. Roof also faces a state capital punishment trial, which is scheduled to begin in January.

Roof faces different charges in each case. State prosecutors in South Carolina charged him with murder and attempted murder, while federal prosecutors charged him with 33 counts including hate crimes, obstruction of religion and firearms offenses.

(Reporting by Brendan O’Brien in Milwaukee; Editing by Raissa Kasolowsky)

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
spot_img
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x