54.2 F
Spokane
Sunday, May 11, 2025
HomeNewsLawyers of church shooter argue federal death penalty unconstitutional

Lawyers of church shooter argue federal death penalty unconstitutional

Date:

Related stories

Five things to know about Pope Leo XIV

Now that the 267th head of the Catholic Church has been chosen, what do we really know about Robert Francis Prevost, now Pope Leo XIV? Here are five things.

FāVS Religion News Roundup: May 9

ICE monitors Spokane immigrant advocate, Washington's Catholic leaders stand firm against child abuse reporting law when it comes to the confessional and the Spokane Hindu Temple offers the community an invitation to participate in a special Hindu ritual and more are featured in this week's FāVS Religion News Roundup.

First US-born pope takes name Pope Leo XIV

The first U.S-born pope Thursday. Cardinal Robert Prevost chose the name Pope Leo XIV and will be the 267th head of the Catholic Church.

White Smoke: First American Pope Elected

Claire Giangravé reports on the Catholic world’s anticipation of a pivotal moment following the white smoke announcement.

Jewish Family Services to host annual benefit brunch May 18

Marti Martin and Faith Hayflich will receive the Julie Morris Outstanding Service Award at Jewish Family Services annual benefit brunch May 18.

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img

(Reuters) – Attorneys for a white man accused of killing nine black parishioners in a racially motivated attack at a South Carolina church a year ago argued that their client should not face the death penalty, asserting the punishment is unconstitutional.

Federal prosecutors are seeking the death penalty against Dylann Roof, 22, who is accused of opening fire on a Bible study session at Charleston’s historic Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church on June 17, 2015.

The shooting shook the country and intensified debate over U.S. race relations, which were already roiled by numerous high-profile police killings of unarmed black people.

Attorneys for Roof argued in a document filed in a U.S. District Court in South Carolina on Monday that the federal death penalty is “cruel and unusual punishment” and, as a result, violates the U.S. Constitution.

“No one can be lawfully sentenced to death or executed under it, no matter what his crimes,” the attorneys wrote in the motion.

A court ruling that the Federal Death Penalty Act is unconstitutional would allow Roof to plead guilty and proceed to the sentencing phase of his case in which he could be to life in prison without parole, his attorneys said.

In an earlier court filing, federal prosecutors cited a number of factors for seeking the death penalty, saying Roof singled out victims who were black and elderly, and showed no remorse. They also cited “substantial planning and premeditation.”

The argument that the death penalty is unconstitutional is a typical line of defense. The federal trial against Roof is set to begin on Nov. 7.

Federal death sentences are rarely carried out in the United States. Roof also faces a state capital punishment trial, which is scheduled to begin in January.

Roof faces different charges in each case. State prosecutors in South Carolina charged him with murder and attempted murder, while federal prosecutors charged him with 33 counts including hate crimes, obstruction of religion and firearms offenses.

(Reporting by Brendan O’Brien in Milwaukee; Editing by Raissa Kasolowsky)

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
spot_img
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x