34.5 F
Spokane
Thursday, April 3, 2025
spot_img
HomeNewsLawyers of church shooter argue federal death penalty unconstitutional

Lawyers of church shooter argue federal death penalty unconstitutional

Date:

spot_img

Related stories

The ADL quietly eliminated its anti-bias educational program

The ADL has shifted focus to combatting antisemitism, phasing out its anti-bias program, and increasingly supporting Israel amidst recent conflicts.

Sravasti Nuns Launch Buddhist Talks on Compassion April 15

Sravasti nuns begin a transformative series of Buddhist talks on compassion, starting April 15, offering practical tools and meditation.

Atheist report: Religious influence in schools grow in Pacific Northwest

The 2025 Atheist report highlights tensions in the Pacific Northwest over parental rights, education, and religious influence in schools.

Spokane faith leaders reflect on COVID lockdown 5 years later: ‘We came out stronger’

Spokane religious communities reflect on their five-year journey since COVID lockdowns began, revealing unexpected growth, technological adaptation and stronger congregations.

Photo Essay: Spokane Trans Day art show draws big crowd

The Trans Day of Visibility Art Show at Spokane Public Library yesterday showcased diverse trans art, fostering community and support with over 200 attendees.

Our Sponsors

spot_img

(Reuters) – Attorneys for a white man accused of killing nine black parishioners in a racially motivated attack at a South Carolina church a year ago argued that their client should not face the death penalty, asserting the punishment is unconstitutional.

Federal prosecutors are seeking the death penalty against Dylann Roof, 22, who is accused of opening fire on a Bible study session at Charleston’s historic Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church on June 17, 2015.

The shooting shook the country and intensified debate over U.S. race relations, which were already roiled by numerous high-profile police killings of unarmed black people.

Attorneys for Roof argued in a document filed in a U.S. District Court in South Carolina on Monday that the federal death penalty is “cruel and unusual punishment” and, as a result, violates the U.S. Constitution.

“No one can be lawfully sentenced to death or executed under it, no matter what his crimes,” the attorneys wrote in the motion.

A court ruling that the Federal Death Penalty Act is unconstitutional would allow Roof to plead guilty and proceed to the sentencing phase of his case in which he could be to life in prison without parole, his attorneys said.

In an earlier court filing, federal prosecutors cited a number of factors for seeking the death penalty, saying Roof singled out victims who were black and elderly, and showed no remorse. They also cited “substantial planning and premeditation.”

The argument that the death penalty is unconstitutional is a typical line of defense. The federal trial against Roof is set to begin on Nov. 7.

Federal death sentences are rarely carried out in the United States. Roof also faces a state capital punishment trial, which is scheduled to begin in January.

Roof faces different charges in each case. State prosecutors in South Carolina charged him with murder and attempted murder, while federal prosecutors charged him with 33 counts including hate crimes, obstruction of religion and firearms offenses.

(Reporting by Brendan O’Brien in Milwaukee; Editing by Raissa Kasolowsky)

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
spot_img
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x