45.4 F
Spokane
Thursday, March 27, 2025
spot_img
HomeCommentaryNot enough words for God

Not enough words for God

Date:

Related stories

When someone cares enough to embrace your imperfections

Celebrating imperfection, this piece reflects on how when we care others, despite flaws, grace shines, much like God's grace does in our weakness.

Protecting human rights shouldn’t be up for debate

Trump pulled the U.S. out of the United Nations Human Rights Council, and this columnist can't understand why. She prescribes a way forward.

Ask a Bahá’í: Where was the Short Obligatory Prayer first mentioned in the Bahá’í writings?

This Ask a Bahá’í column seeks to discover the first time the Short Obligatory Prayer shows up in the Bahá'í writings. Is it in "The Most Holy Book"? Read more and find out.

When democracy finds her voice

"Beyond the ballot box spectacle: How active citizen engagement fuels democracy year-round through advocacy, accountability, and community action—not just during election seasons.

Another broken promise: Interior sued over cuts to Indigenous schools

The Trump administration’s firing of staff at Indigenous schools, without tribal consultation, leads to a lawsuit over more broken promises.

Our Sponsors

spot_img
www.danielebogiatto.it/Flickr
www.danielebogiatto.it/Flickr

I don’t know if other languages have the same problems describing the almighty, but English simply does not have enough words. English-speakers are stuck with choosing from one of two gender-specific pronouns: he or she.  That’s very limiting to describe a limitless God.

God does not have gender, God is neither he nor she but it’s all I’ve got to work with. If I use he as was always done in the churches I attended until just recently, I run the risk that women who have been hurt by males will be afraid of this Father-God. If I try to use she, often stumbling over the word because it is such a foreign way for me to address God, I possibly create a barrier in the minds of those more old-school like myself, people for whom Mother-God evokes an image of an earthly Greek goddess and not the creator of the universe. Heaven forbid I should use the pronoun “it” to describe God, as this would probably offend everyone. “It” seems without personality, without consciousness, without life. As a third option, “it” really sucks. Can’t go male, can’t go female, can’t go neuter…where to go?

Some people try to avoid this linguistic difficulty altogether by only using the word God at all times, but this can get a tad redundant. “The Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want. God maketh me to lie down in green pastures. God leads me beside still waters. God restores my soul. God leads me in paths..” — you get the idea. And even this example holds a hidden gender problem; the word Lord is emphatically male. To try and write this verse using the female slant would require us to use the word “lady” which brings its own alternate meanings. Frustrating!

I don’t want the words I use to be a barrier keeping people from God, so how do I portray God as the truly inclusive, all-loving parent that he/she is?  By using as many different words as I possibly can. Mother, father; creator, sustainer; master, savior; lover, friend.  There simply aren’t enough words to describe God.  God’s just too big for language.

Join us for our next Coffee Talk for a discussion on “The Desensitization of Language” which will be at 10 a.m., April 5 at Indaba Coffee. Shannon is a panelist. 

Jan Shannon
Jan Shannon
Jan Shannon is a full-time seminary student at Iliff School of Theology, a wife, mom, granny, and gay Christian.

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img
spot_img

1 COMMENT

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dennis
Dennis
10 years ago

Jan,

I don’t think it’s the English language which poses a problem since the scriptures were written in Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek. They are all capable of identifying gender and presented God the Father as male, and even though we know He is invisible and doesn’t have a physical body, it was His choice to be presented that way. Jesus claimed to be God, but in the flesh was obviously male. The third person, also bodiless ( is that even a word?), the Holy Spirit also presents Himself as male.

Is this the way you would view scripture or is there something else involved?

spot_img
1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x