By Jim Downard
Q: How do you feel about atheists offering invocations at political events?
I’m ambivalent on it, but then I’m ambivalent on invocations in general, since they so often act as though they are representing the collective group when they may not.
Here’s something that could be said that would cover the matter fairly and honestly, certainly topical, yet without making presumptions on the religious convictions of those assembled (you can never go wrong drawing on Lincoln):
Our Republic was founded on the great principle of secular government “of the People, by the People, for the People.” Our success in that endeavor depends on respect for individual conscience and freedom, along with an abiding reverence for an independent and honest press informing a people who will not be easily swayed by sectarian prejudice, passion or hatred. As we see demagogues threaten to inflame ignorance and fear, forgetting the lessons of history in an appeal to “Alternative Facts,” here and abroad, may we resolve as a nation to affirm the deep principles of our success, and show by our steadfast example what it means for Liberty to enlighten the world.
Many of your answer are funny and based on your own point of view . Why dont you try to answer the question with proof or something like that
It’s “Ask an Atheist,” not “Ask an Atheist to Represent All Atheists.” Also, this question specifically asked what Jim thinks about a particular topic.
The question was “[h]ow do you feel about athletes offering invocations…” What, apart from telling the reader how he feels, would count as “proof” that he feels that way? What exactly, o anonymous troll, are you seeking in terms of an answer here?
Im pretty sure Jim is cherry picking and asking his own questions. Typical and pathetic at the same time.