HomeCommentaryBill Cosby: Were the warning signs there all along?

Bill Cosby: Were the warning signs there all along?

Date:

Related stories

Why I’m religious, not just spiritual: Faith, like exercise, needs community

A faith leader reflects on the importance of community, discipleship and spiritual support, arguing that faith grows stronger when practiced alongside others.

Reject religious bigotry, embrace Abrahamic kinship

A writer explores the shared religious roots of Islam, Judaism and Christianity, arguing that hospitality, charity and compassion form from Abrahamic faiths.

How many flags make you a patriot? 

A reflection on flags, patriotism, and political devotion. The author argues that patriotism is defined by actions and democratic values, not just symbols.

Our Sponsors

Reading Time: 2 minutes

By Jim Downard

Bill Cosby has just been convicted of drugging and raping women, and some have speculated he may die in jail, as he is in his 80s and in apparently failing health.

All the talent, the humor, the acting career, the good vibes and inspiration that had been the Cosby brand over decades were now dissolved in a rancid revelation of the most sordid and sad kind.

The question naturally arises how many of the warning signs of a troubled personality were present all along.  Some have noted how the drug and sex themes occurred all the way back in his 1960s comedy routines, but something much more recent has stuck in my mind, something not directly related to sex or drugs at all.

In his later years, when Cosby appeared as a guest on talk shows (which he only did rarely) something about his behavior struck me at the time as decidedly odd.  He would come out and quickly object to something the host had said in their introduction or opening remarks, often the most trivial thing, matters of manner or rhetoric, taking issue with them in a way that immediately put the host on the defensive.

Cosby was not merely acting as the imperious professor, but as someone anxious to pick a fight, and thereby achieve dominance over the host, putting them in a subordinate and supplicant position.

Yes, it got laughs, but perhaps a little too nervously.  Was it just an act, a way of taking command of the stage?  Possibly.  That’s what I thought at the time.  But it may also have reflected a personality that always had to be in control, one that could never be honestly and equally vulnerable, on equal terms, but always had to present the persona of dominance and superiority.

The control freak on display with male talk show hosts … how might that dynamic play out with women, alone, with just a drink away from his being the dominant once again, with no emotional attachment, no honesty or vulnerability on his part?

Perhaps I’m reading too much into Cosby’s later stage behavior.  Perhaps he was just being boorish.  Or perhaps not.

If everyone who reads and appreciates FāVS, helps fund it, we can provide more content like this. For as little as $5, you can support FāVS – and it only takes a minute. Thank you.

<[give_form id=”53376″ show_title=”true” display_style=”button”]/div>

Jim Downard
Jim Downard
Jim Downard is a Spokane native (with a sojourn in Southern California back in the early 1960s) who was raised in a secular family, so says had no personal faith to lose. He's always been a history and science buff (getting a bachelor's in the former area at what was then Eastern Washington University in the early 1970s).

1 COMMENT

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Neal Schindler
Neal Schindler
8 years ago

I heard one commentator compare Cosby’s victim-blaming of black communities in poverty — saying black people who were struggling were doing so not due to systemic injustice going back to slavery but due to their own character flaws — to the kind of gaslighting and victim-blaming abusers, including sexual predators, often engage in.