fbpx
22.6 F
Spokane
Sunday, January 19, 2025
spot_img
HomeCommentaryAmerican History: Religious Intolerance, Part 2

American History: Religious Intolerance, Part 2

Date:

Related stories

A lifetime of friendship built on common values and uncommon experiences

A lifetime of friendship spans 80 years as two nonagenarians share their journey from childhood neighbors to biweekly chats, navigating careers in law, ministry, ecology, and teaching across continents.

India’s Dalits suffer unrelentless oppression and violence

Learn about the global oppression and violence suffered by Indian Dalits and how their treatment calls for MLK's solutions for justice.

The Problem Isn’t My Car, It’s Me: A Lesson in Self-Reflection

A mechanic's puzzling car diagnosis leads to deeper self-reflection about personal responsibility, weaving together everyday frustrations with timeless religious teachings on looking inward.

Why hinges and virtues are more connected than you think

Virtues are not limited to the west, literary canons or religious doctrines. The author shows how humanism follows similar virtues without religion.

Grow spiritually and discover nature in Vancouver Island’s contemplative program

Explore contemplation and spirituality in nature with the Brandt Oyster River Hermitage Society's unique program. Immerse yourself in a deeper spirituality in a rustic hermitage.

Our Sponsors

spot_img

By Brien Pittman

Read part one

“The idea that the United States has always been a bastion of religious freedom is reassuring  — and utterly at odds with the historical record.”

In the storybook version most of us learned in school, the Pilgrims came to America aboard the Mayflower in search of religious freedom in 1620. The Puritans soon followed, for the same reason. Ever since these religious dissidents arrived at their shining “city upon a hill,” as their governor John Winthrop called it, millions from around the world have done the same, coming to an America where they found a welcome melting pot in which everyone was free to practice his or her own faith.

The problem is that this tidy narrative is an American myth. The real story of religion in America’s past is an often awkward, frequently embarrassing and occasionally bloody tale that most civics books and high-school texts either paper over or shunt to the side. And much of the recent conversation about America’s ideal of religious freedom has paid lip service to this comforting tableau.

From the earliest arrival of Europeans on America’s shores, religion has often been a cudgel, used to discriminate, suppress and even kill the foreign, the “heretic” and the “unbeliever”— including the “heathen” natives already here. Moreover, while it is true that the vast majority of early-generation Americans were Christian, the pitched battles between various Protestant sects and, more explosively, between Protestants and Catholics, present an unavoidable contradiction to the widely held notion that America is a “Christian nation.”

First, a little overlooked history: the initial encounter between Europeans in the future United States came with the establishment of a Huguenot (French Protestant) colony in 1564 at Fort Caroline (near modern Jacksonville, Florida). More than half a century before the Mayflower set sail, French pilgrims had come to America in search of religious freedom.

The Spanish had other ideas. In 1565, they established a forward operating base at St. Augustine and proceeded to wipe out the Fort Caroline colony. The Spanish commander, Pedro Menéndez de Avilés, wrote to the Spanish King Philip II that he had “hanged all those we had found in [Fort Caroline] because…they were scattering the odious Lutheran doctrine in these Provinces.” When hundreds of survivors of a shipwrecked French fleet washed up on the beaches of Florida, they were put to the sword, beside a river the Spanish called Matanzas (“slaughters”). In other words, the first encounter between European Christians in America ended in a blood bath.

The much-ballyhooed arrival of the Pilgrims and Puritans in New England in the early 1600s was indeed a response to persecution that these religious dissenters had experienced in England. But the Puritan fathers of the Massachusetts Bay Colony did not countenance tolerance of opposing religious views. Their “city upon a hill” was a theocracy that brooked no dissent, religious or political.

The most famous dissidents within the Puritan community, Roger Williams and Anne Hutchinson, were banished following disagreements over theology and policy. From Puritan Boston’s earliest days, Catholics (“Papists”) were anathema and were banned from the colonies, along with other non-Puritans. Four Quakers were hanged in Boston between 1659 and 1661 for persistently returning to the city to stand up for their beliefs.

Throughout the colonial era, Anglo-American antipathy toward Catholics — especially French and Spanish Catholics — was pronounced and often reflected in the sermons of such famous clerics as Cotton Mather and in statutes that discriminated against Catholics in matters of property and voting. Anti-Catholic feelings even contributed to the revolutionary mood in America after King George III extended an olive branch to French Catholics in Canada with the Quebec Act of 1774, which recognized their religion.

When George Washington dispatched Benedict Arnold on a mission to court French Canadians’ support for the American Revolution in 1775, he cautioned Arnold not to let their religion get in the way. “Prudence, policy and a true Christian Spirit,” Washington advised, “will lead us to look with compassion upon their errors, without insulting them.” (After Arnold betrayed the American Cause, he publicly cited America’s alliance with Catholic France as one of his reasons for doing so.)

Philadelphia's Bible Riots of 1844 mirrored a proclivity toward anti-Catholic intolerance and hostility that coursed through the 19th-century. (Granger Collection, New York)
Philadelphia’s Bible Riots of 1844 mirrored a proclivity toward anti-Catholic intolerance and hostility that coursed through the 19th-century. (Granger Collection, New York)

 

 

Brien Pittman
Brien Pittman
Brien’s articles for FāVS generally revolve around ideas and beliefs that create unhealthy deadlock divisions between groups. He has received (minor) writing awards for his short stories and poetry from the cities of Portland, Oregon and the city of (good beer) Sapporo, Japan. In 2010 he was asked to present several articles for the California Senate Committee “Task Force for Suicide Prevention” and has been published by online magazines and a couple national poetry anthologies in print form.

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x