52.7 F
Spokane
Saturday, March 8, 2025
spot_img
HomeNewsSupreme Court allows gay marriage to expand to 30 states

Supreme Court allows gay marriage to expand to 30 states

Date:

Related stories

Spokane’s Haitian community struggles with looming deportation

Haitians in Spokane fear deportation after Trump ends Temporary Protected Status, impacting hundreds who rely on the program to live and work legally in the U.S.

FāVS Religion News Roundup: March 7

This week's FāVS Religion News covers a WA clergy mandatory reporting bill, gender-affirming care for minors, finding detained immigrants and more.

Priest Lake Church offers unique Stations of the Cross for Lenten worship

St. Blanche Church in Priest Lake offers a unique outdoor Stations of the Cross, inviting all to reflect on Jesus' journey through nature, prayer and community this Lenten season.

Gonzaga celebrates Ash Wednesday with interfaith participation

This Ash Wednesday, Gonzaga University offers diverse ash distribution across campus, inviting all faiths for an inclusive, interfaith experience.

Pope Francis suffers two ‘acute respiratory failures’

On Monday (March 3), Pope Francis suffered two respiratory crisis and now has a "guarded" prognosis. He has been in the hospital since Feb. 14.

Our Sponsors

spot_img

[todaysdate]

 
WASHINGTON (RNS) The Supreme Court refused to get involved in the national debate over same-sex marriage on Monday (Oct. 6), leaving intact lower court rulings that will legalize the practice in 11 additional states.

The unexpected decision by the justices, announced without further explanation, immediately affects five states in which federal appeals courts had struck down bans against gay marriage: Virginia, Indiana, Wisconsin, Oklahoma and Utah.

It also will bring along six other states located in the judicial circuits overseen by those federal appeals courts: North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia, Colorado, Kansas and Wyoming.

The action will bring to 30 the number of states where gays and lesbians can marry. Appeals courts in Cincinnati and San Francisco are considering cases that could expand that number further, presuming the Supreme Court remains outside the legal fray.

Most court-watchers had predicted the justices would hear one or more cases this term and issue a verdict with nationwide implications by next June. But the justices, perhaps sensing that the country is headed toward legalizing gay marriage without their involvement, chose to deny states’ appeals.

Nineteen states and the District of Columbia currently permit same-sex marriage, and the high court ruled last year that the federal government cannot deny benefits to such couples. It sidestepped the remaining state laws by taking no position on the merits of California’s Proposition 8 ban, which had been struck down by lower federal courts.

Since those decisions were handed down, six additional states have legalized gay marriage, and federal and state judges in 14 more states have overturned marriage bans, beginning with Utah last December. All those rulings have been put on hold during the appeals process, leaving 31 bans in place.

The cases that had been under consideration included those from three federal appeals courts:

  • A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Denver-based 10th Circuit ruled 2-1 in June and July that same-sex couples in Utah and Oklahoma have “the same fundamental right” to marry as heterosexuals.
  • A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Richmond, Va.-based 4th Circuit ruled 2-1 in July that gay men and lesbians have a constitutional right to marry that is paramount to state marriage laws.
  • A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Chicago-based 7th Circuit declared unanimously last month that gay marriage bans in Indiana and Wisconsin threaten “the welfare of American children.”

Last month, a federal district judge in Louisiana became the first to uphold a state’s ban in the wake of last year’s Supreme Court rulings. Until then, gay marriage proponents had won every federal case.

(Richard Wolf writes for USA Today)

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
spot_img
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x