55.3 F
Spokane
Tuesday, March 25, 2025
spot_img
HomeCommentaryDrugs aren't immoral, the purpose for which they are produced can be

Drugs aren’t immoral, the purpose for which they are produced can be

Date:

Related stories

Ask a Bahá’í: Where was the Short Obligatory Prayer first mentioned in the Bahá’í writings?

This Ask a Bahá’í column seeks to discover the first time the Short Obligatory Prayer shows up in the Bahá'í writings. Is it in "The Most Holy Book"? Read more and find out.

When democracy finds her voice

"Beyond the ballot box spectacle: How active citizen engagement fuels democracy year-round through advocacy, accountability, and community action—not just during election seasons.

Another broken promise: Interior sued over cuts to Indigenous schools

The Trump administration’s firing of staff at Indigenous schools, without tribal consultation, leads to a lawsuit over more broken promises.

Ask a Buddhist: What is the ‘Day of Miracles’?

This Ask a Buddhist column from Ven. Thubten Chonyi from Sravasti Abbey. She talks about the "Day of Miracles," what they were for and what was their result.

When time destroys, art breathes new life

A sleepless mind at 2 a.m. grapples with time, change and the transformative power of art, finding solace in creativity’s resistance to decay.

Our Sponsors

spot_img

No, the measure legalizing pot smoking does not change my mind about the morality of either Cannabis Sativa or its use. I don’t think any drugs are in and of themselves moral or immoral, but the purposes for which they are produced tell a different story.

Heroin and all the opiates are wonderful pain killers, and in England heroin is used for pain control with terminal patients. That is clearly a moral use of the drug. On the other hand, to produce heroin for the purpose of making millions of dollars off of addicts, that is clearly an immoral use of heroin. Same thing with cocaine. Same thing with pot. 

Left unsaid here is any comment about excessive use of these things by people. Rather than get too far into that one, I will end by saying that after 30 years of talking with people addicted to all different sorts of drugs, mostly alcohol of course, I am entirely convinced that addiction is not a moral issue at all. Addiction really is a disease, and with very few exceptions victims of diseases mostly are not at fault for getting the disease itself. However, victims of diseases are responsible for recognizing their symptoms and getting treatment for their disease, and that is as true of addictive patterns as it is of cancer.  Turning the use of any mood altering substances into a moral question, and as a society we tend to do that, inhibits recognition of diseases of addiction, and makes the problem of addiction worse. 

So again, to end where I began, the morality of drugs of any type is mostly not wrapped up in their use; the morality of drugs is mostly wrapped in the purposes for which they are produced.  If we could get that straight as a society, we would be much better off.

Bill Ellis
Bill Ellis
Rev. Bill Ellis is dean of St. John’s Cathedral. He has a bachelor’s degree in history, a Master of Divinity and holds an honorary Doctor of Divinity degree from Church Divinity School of the Pacific.

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
spot_img
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x