fbpx
32.6 F
Spokane
Friday, December 20, 2024
spot_img
HomeCommentaryDrugs aren't immoral, the purpose for which they are produced can be

Drugs aren’t immoral, the purpose for which they are produced can be

Date:

Related stories

Death may mute Christmas, but not love

While this holiday season is muted for those of us who lost loved ones in December, by loving people despite our differences, we are truly living the commandment of so many faiths – to care for one another.  

Rethinking Christmas: Finding Meaning Through Sustainable Celebrations

Discover how to celebrate Christmas sustainably while reflecting on Jesus's counter-cultural teachings. Learn practical tips for eco-friendly holiday decorating and gifting in Spokane.

Aid Restrictions Hold Americans Back

A personal story reveals how America's benefits system traps people with disabilities in poverty, despite their desires to work and contribute to society. A call for reform.

The sacred art of long-distance friendship: A Buddhist guide

learn friendship can be a sacred thing. In Buddhism, for example, it’s a key part of the spiritual path. Spiritual friendship (kalyana mitra) is a relationship that elevates one's ethical and well-being.

Why the woke movement matters today

Exploring the concept of 'woke' and its impact on American society. Delving into the controversy and discussing the importance of staying woke in today's political landscape.

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img

No, the measure legalizing pot smoking does not change my mind about the morality of either Cannabis Sativa or its use. I don’t think any drugs are in and of themselves moral or immoral, but the purposes for which they are produced tell a different story.

Heroin and all the opiates are wonderful pain killers, and in England heroin is used for pain control with terminal patients. That is clearly a moral use of the drug. On the other hand, to produce heroin for the purpose of making millions of dollars off of addicts, that is clearly an immoral use of heroin. Same thing with cocaine. Same thing with pot. 

Left unsaid here is any comment about excessive use of these things by people. Rather than get too far into that one, I will end by saying that after 30 years of talking with people addicted to all different sorts of drugs, mostly alcohol of course, I am entirely convinced that addiction is not a moral issue at all. Addiction really is a disease, and with very few exceptions victims of diseases mostly are not at fault for getting the disease itself. However, victims of diseases are responsible for recognizing their symptoms and getting treatment for their disease, and that is as true of addictive patterns as it is of cancer.  Turning the use of any mood altering substances into a moral question, and as a society we tend to do that, inhibits recognition of diseases of addiction, and makes the problem of addiction worse. 

So again, to end where I began, the morality of drugs of any type is mostly not wrapped up in their use; the morality of drugs is mostly wrapped in the purposes for which they are produced.  If we could get that straight as a society, we would be much better off.

Bill Ellis
Bill Ellis
Rev. Bill Ellis is dean of St. John’s Cathedral. He has a bachelor’s degree in history, a Master of Divinity and holds an honorary Doctor of Divinity degree from Church Divinity School of the Pacific.

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x