70.6 F
Spokane
Tuesday, May 6, 2025
HomeCommentaryAskAsk An Atheist: Why do nonbelievers disbelieve?

Ask An Atheist: Why do nonbelievers disbelieve?

Date:

Related stories

How a sudden clinic shutdown upended my husband’s mental healthcare

Therapeutic Solutions clinic in Spokane Valley abruptly closed March 14, leaving 1,800 patients like the author's husband without mental healthcare.

How to heal eco-anxiety with Buddhist principles of interdependence

From chickens to climate action, Tracy Simmons finds hope in backyard ecology and Buddhist values like interdependence, urging local steps to counter eco-anxiety.

Ask a Buddhist: Is Theravada Buddhism closest to the Buddha’s?

This Ask a Buddhist question explores the different branches of Buddhism, including Theravada, and what they teach, where they come from and how close they are to the Buddha's original teachings.

Is a faith-based charter school a threat to religious freedom, or a necessity to uphold it?

The Supreme Court hears case on Oklahoma's bid to fund faith-based charter school, raising key First Amendment church-state questions.

Hey, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., I am autistic and I am OK

Read the poet's response to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s recent comments on autism. The writer shares how discovering he was autistic later in life made his past make much more sense.

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img

By Jim Downard

What do you want to Ask an Atheist? Submit your questions online or fill out the form below. 

Why do nonbelievers disbelieve?

SPO_House-ad_Ask-an-atheist_0425133Nonbelievers disbelieve in particular religions for many of the same reasons believers disbelieve in the religions they don’t believe in: the lack of convincing evidence for it. (It is, of course, what constitutes “convincing” that reveals much about how one goes about “proving” supernatural entities or forces.)

Believers are perfectly capable of explaining the reasons why they don’t follow somebody else’s religion, but bog down when they fail to apply the same standards to their own. This is especially so when the religious mention their own personal faith apart from evidence, forgetting other religions have faithful showing exactly that same commitment.

Atheists try to apply the same standards to all beliefs, exempting none.

Jim Downard
Jim Downard
Jim Downard is a Spokane native (with a sojourn in Southern California back in the early 1960s) who was raised in a secular family, so says had no personal faith to lose. He's always been a history and science buff (getting a bachelor's in the former area at what was then Eastern Washington University in the early 1970s).

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img

1 COMMENT

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MHilditch
MHilditch
10 years ago

“It is, of course, what constitutes “convincing” that reveals much about how one goes about “proving” supernatural entities or forces.” And… it also turns greatly on what one considers valid “evidence.” Many moderns reject faith perspectives because they cannot be subjected to scientific proof. But, such proof depends on the repeatability of what is to be proven. History fails here just as readily as religion, yet most scientists do not reject history. So goes the plight of those who would testify to the reality of faith.

spot_img
1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x