fbpx
48.3 F
Spokane
Wednesday, December 18, 2024
spot_img
HomeCommentaryA Problem with Partisan Politics

A Problem with Partisan Politics

Date:

Related stories

Rethinking Christmas: Finding Meaning Through Sustainable Celebrations

Discover how to celebrate Christmas sustainably while reflecting on Jesus's counter-cultural teachings. Learn practical tips for eco-friendly holiday decorating and gifting in Spokane.

Aid Restrictions Hold Americans Back

A personal story reveals how America's benefits system traps people with disabilities in poverty, despite their desires to work and contribute to society. A call for reform.

The sacred art of long-distance friendship: A Buddhist guide

learn friendship can be a sacred thing. In Buddhism, for example, it’s a key part of the spiritual path. Spiritual friendship (kalyana mitra) is a relationship that elevates one's ethical and well-being.

Why the woke movement matters today

Exploring the concept of 'woke' and its impact on American society. Delving into the controversy and discussing the importance of staying woke in today's political landscape.

Syria faces new crossroads after Assad’s fall

The end of Assad's regime in Syria marks a new chapter in the country's history. Read more about the complex emotions and potential for change now taking place from writer Farrah Hassen.

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img

By Scott McIntyre

Confidence and credibility can disintegrate in the eyes of the American public when partisan politics, or activity that looks like it, are viewed.  Take the recent calls for Labor Secretary Acosta to resign as an example.

Members of Congress probably have more resources at their disposable than the general public, to determine if Acosta’s behavior in the Jeffrey Epstein sex crimes case, more than a decade ago, made him unfit to continue in his role in Trump’s cabinet.  But what did the public hear?

Democrats called for his resignation; Republicans remained silent, outright defended him, or seemed to speak indirectly when questioned.  Reading articles from the NY Times, the Washington Post, The Guardian, and NPR, each of the following Democrats said he should step down: Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, Florida congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Virginia senator Tim Kaine, and Montana senator Jon Tester.

In an article on The Hill, these Democratic candidates for president agreed with their party mates in Congress: Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Amy Klobuchar, Elizabeth Warren,  Bernie Sanders, Cory Booker, Michael Bennet, Kirsten Gillibrand, Beto O’Rourke, and John Delaney.

On the other hand, in the NY Times piece mentioned earlier, we were told, “Republican senators, who all voted to confirm Mr. Acosta, were cagey in their defense. “To the degree there’s new information, I think people are willing to take a look at that,” said Senator John Thune of South Dakota, the No. 2 Republican in the Senate. “But I think most people believe that he went through a very thorough vetting process when he got his current job.”

And the Washington Post article tells us that Sen. Susan Collins of Maine “said she did not understand why Epstein’s Florida victims were not notified of the plea agreement a decade ago, as required by federal law. But she stopped short of calling on the secretary to step aside.”

Do I have the opinion of every Republican in Congress listed?  Certainly not, but I also don’t have 100% of the Democrats either.  And this problematic issue exists on both sides of the aisle.  If you’re a Republican, you know there have been times where our party is the one speaking up against the opposition while they remain nearly silent.  And that means the confidence and credibility issue spelled out below is non-partisan.

When a jury returns a unanimous verdict or a branch of Congress is undivided when voting on an issue, the public is likely to feel more confident that their decision was the right one.  Could there be mistakes?  Certainly, but undisputed agreement increases confidence.

And in the political realm, if a leading member of one party stands up to call out a member of their own party, we immediately find their charge more credible than when one party is ‘attacking’ a representative of the other.  There are too many political reasons for going after the other party but you have little to gain when you speak out against a member of your own group, except credibility.

Your donations can help us provide more content like this!

[give_form id=”53376″ show_title=”true” display_style=”button”]
Scott McIntyre
Scott McIntyre
Scott McIntyre is glad his parents didn’t name him Vladimir or he’d be listed last on this page. While a long time California resident, he was the Oakland Spirituality Examiner for Examiner.com from 2011-12 and about the same time began blogging on several topics. The first, teaching Christians how to lovingly share their spiritual beliefs, emphasized skills that can benefit all forms of one-to-one interaction. He also writes on marriage, travel, downsizing, humor and the motive behind people’s words and actions. After retiring in 2016, Scott embarked on some major ‘R & R’ — Relocating and Rebranding. Following in his sister’s footsteps from the early 80’s, and later in the decade, his parent’s, Scott left the Golden State to become a Washingtonian in a small town just west of Spokane County.

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x