54.1 F
Spokane
Sunday, April 13, 2025
spot_img
HomeCommentaryMeat & Potatoes: What is Pascal's Wager?

Meat & Potatoes: What is Pascal’s Wager?

Date:

spot_img

Related stories

Let our better ‘ships’ rise with us

Greed sank great ships of bipartisan-ship, citizen-ship and others. With courage, we can raise them and sail toward something better and rise again!

Sociologist’s new book explains why organized religion has lost relevancy

Organized religion isn't just declining. It has become culturally obsolete. So says Christian Smith in his newest book, "Why Religion Went Obsolete: The Demise of Traditional Faith in America."

For Jews traumatized by Oct. 7, Passover Seder is a model for how to process it

Learn how Jews can use the Passover Seder as a way to reframe their Oct. 7 trauma through the ritual's ceremony, transforming its horror into a story of hope and renewal.

Protect public schools: Keep religious instruction — and its cover-ups — out.

This column communicates how church abuse scandals don’t belong in public schools. Religious instruction and its cover-ups need to stay out of classrooms.

Tesla owners speak out to balance the narrative

Read how this Tesla owner defends car choice, urges peaceful protests and clarifies their purchase was for practicality, not politics.

Our Sponsors

spot_img

Professor Keith Wyma of Whitworth University explains Pascal’s Wager and how it could affect our beliefs and how we live our lives.

Rosemary McFarland
Rosemary McFarlandhttps://www.youtube.com/user/Lostbetweenthepages
Rosemary McFarland grew up in the mountains at a Christian summer camp before moving to the country.

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img
spot_img
spot_img

2 COMMENTS

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jim Downard
10 years ago

Wyma’s summary is both concise and illustrative of where the Wager breaks down logically. I noted this problem generally in a response to one of the “Ask an Atheist” questions (“Why Don’t Atheists Believe in God” on February 24th): the snag is the assumption that there is only one venue to place one’s bet (In Wyma’s case, “Christianity” as though Protestants and Catholics and Orthodox and so on could be mushed together). In actual fact, the potential better is facing a veritable Las Vegas of options, competing religious casinos (Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, etc.), each one of which has varying tables on hand, all lobbying for your one and only bet to be placed there and not somewhere else. Pascal’s Wager carries weight only so long as the game is rigged as a simple either/or option where only one faith (or version of it) is offered as the sole alternative to nonbelief. Three Card Monte anyone?

I do like Wyma’s phrase “fake it till you make it” though, which brings up another, perhaps even more troubling, aspect to the logic of the Wager. Should a god even accept a “faith” tendered not out of genuine conviction, but only as a probabilistic dodge to insure you against hell fire? And is a deity that would spare the trickester on those grounds but roast an otherwise virtious non-believer who could not in good conscience trim their convictions so finely be rightly accused of a distorted sense of justice?

Pascal’s Wager is thus as big a can of worms as the one it is seeking to put a lid on.

Dennis
Dennis
10 years ago

First, I’d say that since it is “Pascal’s” wager, he gets to set the venue. Let the religionists get their own wager! He presents it in the context he believes and let’s the hearers take their chances against his odds.

I would also take issue with Wyma’s presentation as the wager representing accepting “christianity”. No one is going to win this wager by accepting anything less than the person of The Lord Jesus Christ. The theme of scripture beginning to end is to relate to the one true living God on His terms, our good works to Him are equal to filthy used rags (Is 64:6). He is also clear that contrary to the imaginary god you set up, God will expose and condemn every phoney (Matt 7:21-23). Even though the wager, like all illustrations, has its limitations, the motive is right. He cared that no one experience the heat that he believed in his heart those who bet against it would experience.

spot_img
2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x