43.6 F
Spokane
Tuesday, April 1, 2025
spot_img
HomeCommentaryMeat & Potatoes: What is Pascal's Wager?

Meat & Potatoes: What is Pascal’s Wager?

Date:

spot_img

Related stories

A call to national unity: ‘Try to love one another. Right now.’

Classism and inequality are real, but the focus should be on national unity, not dividing by party. We need to work together to address economic struggles.

Multiple cultures clash over the future of the American dream

If the future of the American dream is to survive, her people need to reaquaint themselves with the culture of civility and honesty. Then, they need to clash against disinformation, social media influencers, and more.

Ask an Evangelical: Why did God send Jesus Christ to die for us?

In this Ask an Evangelical column, the reader asks why did God send his son, Jesus, to die for us. This answer centers on blood, perfect sacrifices and the need for atonement.

How to be religious without being spiritual

Read this counter guide to Sam Harris' mindfulness-based spirituality, emphasizing the value being religious, living for others without requiring spirituality.

When someone cares enough to embrace your imperfections

Celebrating imperfection, this piece reflects on how when we care others, despite flaws, grace shines, much like God's grace does in our weakness.

Our Sponsors

spot_img

Professor Keith Wyma of Whitworth University explains Pascal’s Wager and how it could affect our beliefs and how we live our lives.

Rosemary McFarland
Rosemary McFarlandhttps://www.youtube.com/user/Lostbetweenthepages
Rosemary McFarland grew up in the mountains at a Christian summer camp before moving to the country.

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img
spot_img

2 COMMENTS

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest


2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jim Downard
10 years ago

Wyma’s summary is both concise and illustrative of where the Wager breaks down logically. I noted this problem generally in a response to one of the “Ask an Atheist” questions (“Why Don’t Atheists Believe in God” on February 24th): the snag is the assumption that there is only one venue to place one’s bet (In Wyma’s case, “Christianity” as though Protestants and Catholics and Orthodox and so on could be mushed together). In actual fact, the potential better is facing a veritable Las Vegas of options, competing religious casinos (Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, etc.), each one of which has varying tables on hand, all lobbying for your one and only bet to be placed there and not somewhere else. Pascal’s Wager carries weight only so long as the game is rigged as a simple either/or option where only one faith (or version of it) is offered as the sole alternative to nonbelief. Three Card Monte anyone?

I do like Wyma’s phrase “fake it till you make it” though, which brings up another, perhaps even more troubling, aspect to the logic of the Wager. Should a god even accept a “faith” tendered not out of genuine conviction, but only as a probabilistic dodge to insure you against hell fire? And is a deity that would spare the trickester on those grounds but roast an otherwise virtious non-believer who could not in good conscience trim their convictions so finely be rightly accused of a distorted sense of justice?

Pascal’s Wager is thus as big a can of worms as the one it is seeking to put a lid on.

Dennis
Dennis
10 years ago

First, I’d say that since it is “Pascal’s” wager, he gets to set the venue. Let the religionists get their own wager! He presents it in the context he believes and let’s the hearers take their chances against his odds.

I would also take issue with Wyma’s presentation as the wager representing accepting “christianity”. No one is going to win this wager by accepting anything less than the person of The Lord Jesus Christ. The theme of scripture beginning to end is to relate to the one true living God on His terms, our good works to Him are equal to filthy used rags (Is 64:6). He is also clear that contrary to the imaginary god you set up, God will expose and condemn every phoney (Matt 7:21-23). Even though the wager, like all illustrations, has its limitations, the motive is right. He cared that no one experience the heat that he believed in his heart those who bet against it would experience.

spot_img
2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x