fbpx
41.9 F
Spokane
Friday, October 4, 2024
HomeCommentaryChristmas in September: Trump gave us 'source methods' gifts debating Harris

Christmas in September: Trump gave us ‘source methods’ gifts debating Harris

Date:

Related stories

FāVS Religion News Roundup: Oct. 4

This week's roundup features several events taking place over the week including a Habitat-Spokane Women Build event, Gonzaga's Lincoln LGBTQ+ Resource Center celebrating 20 years, an upcoming Sharing the Dharma Day at Sravasti Abbey and more.

From science to AI: The crucial quest for truth in an era of deception

Discover the complexities of truth-seeking in a world of deception. Explore the roles of science and AI and the ethical challenges they face with spreading truth.

Should Christian men run America? Hell no, say abuse survivors in new documentary

"For Our Daughters" is a labor of love for Kristin Kobes Du Mez, a professor of history at Calvin University and author of "Jesus and John Wayne," and award-winning filmmaker Carl Byker. The two have been working on a long project about Du Mez' book but worried the voices of abuse survivors might get overshadowed in a longer documentary.

A List of Greetings for Jewish Holidays For Non-Jews

Have you ever wanted to wish your Jewish friends a happy holiday, but maybe you weren’t sure if the upcoming Jewish holiday even was a happy one? You are not alone.

Local and National UCC leaders denounce hate, stand with Haitian community in Springfield

UCC leaders condemn xenophobic and violent rhetoric against the Haitian community in Springfield, Ohio. Learn more about the impact of false assertions.

Our Sponsors

spot_img

Christmas in September: Trump gave us ‘source methods’ gifts debating Harris

Commentary by James Downard | FāVS News

In my last post on the threat of crazy train Christian nationalism and their connection to a much larger network of often well-heeled ideologues, I opined how the media need to drill politicians on their source field, the better for us voters to decide who among them should get our vote.

In last Tuesday’s debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris there was certainly some fact checking when the former president left the fact path and made incendiary statements that were flat out wrong, but not a single source methods question was asked of either candidate.

But that doesn’t mean we didn’t get some answers on some anyway. For between his constipated glares and hyperbolic rants (“Marxist” Kamala was a preposterous example), Donald Trump inadvertently let slip something of the sort of sources he has been drawing on to arrive at his own version of crazy train.

Do not be misled, Trump is not that imaginative a fellow to come up with fiery nonsense all on his own. Instead, like creationists who think there were dinosaurs on Noah’s Ark, or Marxist-Leninists manning the barricades to defend Stalin’s virtue to this day, Trump is the sort of shallow secondary source addict who merely circles the table of poisonous absurdities and grabs whatever they fancy.

So at one point Trump let slip that an accusation against him had been fully “debunked” by none other than the Three Stooges of FoxTrumpravda: Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham and Jesse Watters, none of whom (collectively or as individuals) could “debunk” their way out of a paper bag if their lives depended on it.

The Blindered leading the even-more-Blindered

Trump has long been known to draw on the mythology of Fox News (Hannity has Trump on speed dial), and sometimes the trail is plain enough, as some drivel appearing on that channel materializes promptly in the rhetoric of “The Convicted One.”

In the debate, though, Trump for once blurted out exactly who he drew on, explicitly identifying the secondary punditry whose oracular certainty was apparently unsullied in his view — people he would never in a million years try to fact check (or even know how to), even as they have never been caught fact checking anything they say either.

But it got even worse, as Trump dived off the mental board into what had never been a filled pool: the preposterous (and nasty) accusation that Haitian refugees in Springfield, Ohio, were rampaging and cooking up their neighbors’ cats and dogs. The look on Harris’ face spoke volumes, and David Muir had to leap in to note ABC News had contacted health authorities in that community and nothing was known of it.

To which Trump replied, in the manner of any deranged uncle doubting we landed on the moon, that he had seen some video of it.

Well gosh, that settles that, doesn’t it? What better qualifications could we have for a president than that he can suck up junk from the internet?

Enter the “Ghost of Source Methods Present”

The source for the pet cooking myth wasn’t hard to trace. Trump’s own VP running-mate JD Vance was pushing it, perhaps as a snarky way to troll the media after the quickly debunked rumor Vance had an inordinate fondness for couch cushions.

Acting in his capacity as a senator (our employee, be reminded), Vance waved about innuendo and hearsay from his constituents about what had supposedly been happening to somebody’s cousin’s neighbor’s pets. Though he did not use the weight of his (or rather OUR) high office to actually investigate any of this to find out if any of it was true in the first place, before shooting off controversial tweets about it.

This thinly veiled racist dog whistle was quickly picked up in the bottom feeder echo chamber, from Ted Cruz (also a senator and so theoretically better than that, when not vacationing in Cancun), smarmy Christian nationalist ideologue Charlie Kirk (whose Turning Point operation is knee deep in the Project 2025 dystopia alluded to in my previous post) and from his “X” Olympus Elon Musk (whose latest product triumph, the Cybertruck, is a hot contender to become the Edsel of Yugos, and dubbed by one wag as the Deploreon).

Just imagine what insights we could obtain were it to become a common practice to intentionally ask source methods questions of political candidates and public figures, instead of waiting for them to accidentally vomit them our way now and then.


The views expressed in this opinion column are those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect the views of FāVS News. FāVS News values diverse perspectives and thoughtful analysis on matters of faith and spirituality.

Jim Downard
Jim Downard
Jim Downard is a Spokane native (with a sojourn in Southern California back in the early 1960s) who was raised in a secular family, so says had no personal faith to lose. He's always been a history and science buff (getting a bachelor's in the former area at what was then Eastern Washington University in the early 1970s).

Our Sponsors

spot_img
spot_img
spot_img

2 COMMENTS

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Walter A Hesford
Walter A Hesford
16 days ago

I appreciate the wit with which you deliver your advice to check the sources of a politician’s rhetoric.

James Downard
James Downard
15 days ago

Source Methods are a vital but sorely lacking aspect to our media coverage, and that defect needs to be remedied.

2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x