34.5 F
Thursday, April 18, 2024
HomeCommentaryThe humanity of violence

The humanity of violence


Related stories

What Is the LDS General Conference?

Twice each year, members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints tune into what is known as general conference. Most are seeking guidance from leaders and listen to their messages with reverence and deep interest.

Avoiding Extremism: Lessons from Authoritarian Overreach and the Value of Democracy

As our election looms, we must understand our own biases. Understanding our biases will help us vote wisely, choosing those we wish to govern us.

Teaching Religious Literacy in the Face of Intolerance

The aim of the Religion Reporting Project is to talk with students about religion in the media, introduce them to experts in the field and — the best part — take them on visits to houses of worship throughout the region.

The Ease of AI Making Decisions for Us Risks Losing the Skills to Do that Ourselves

In a world where what and how people think is already under siege thanks to the algorithms of social media, we risk putting ourselves in an even more perilous position if we allow AI to reach a level of sophistication where it can make all kinds of decisions on our behalf.

Contradictions and Consistency in the Bible: Part One

I do not believe there are any significant contradictions in the Bible. I believe the entire text is “God-breathed.” (2 Timothy 3:16) God is perfectly powerful to have guided the evolution of his holy book.

Our Sponsors


By Mark Azzara

Dear Friend,

Mark Galli, the editor of Christianity Today, recently offered some interesting observations on the human inclination toward violence – what I call the humanity of violence.  Even as I wrote that phrase I was struck by the stark truth of it. And in light of what happened in Florida it’s even more important that I chew on that phrase.

When we use the word “humanity” we normally do so in a positive way. We ascribe to that word a kind of nobility, charity and goodness that is naïve because it denies much of the reality of humanity as we live it out every day.

In his recent email Galli wrote about the “transformation of the human heart by Jesus Christ.” But when I first read that line I misread it as the transformation of Jesus’ human heart. He suffered much, the Bible says. He was perfected through suffering. He griped about those who called him “Lord” but didn’t do what he told them. He couldn’t seem to escape from people who kept pestering him for the miracles they wanted and yet, when he wanted them to remain near him in his darkest hour, they all ran away.

If Jesus’ heart hadn’t been transformed would he have wound up acting violently, or at least advocating violence? If he hadn’t surrendered to God would he have been willing to deny himself and become a victim of violence?

We all see the benefit of Jesus denying himself. If he hadn’t denied his very self – the self that wanted to go on living – he wouldn’t have learned the human value and need for all of us to do so. Or to put it another way, if he hadn’t emptied himself he would have become full of himself.

To be fully human is to be violent at certain times, or at least to desire violence. I see that truth operating in my life a lot – more proof I need Jesus every day as my savior. But Jesus was fully human and yet never violent. Judas would have argued that the only thing Jesus needed to “save” himself was to become violent.

Galli writes about the “out-of-fashion … naive … (and) simplistic” notion that our hearts can be transformed by Jesus Christ. That is the way a lot of people look at transformation.

Lots of Christians struggle with, or flat-out object to, the idea of Jesus transforming them. I see way too many Christians (any number is way too many) who advocate violence as the way to spread the Gospel – e.g., the violence of condemning “sinners,” especially those considered guilty of sexual sins who ought to be treated violently, with prison terms or execution; the violence of imposing so-called “Christian” values by legislation or fiat; and the violence of condemning those who believe different theological doctrines.

The humanity of violence. I challenge you to apply that phrase to yourself. Perhaps, as a result, the next time you are tempted to angrily condemn someone else, no matter who, no matter for what, you may just feel the desire to reconsider your attitudes.

Comments regarding this article are always welcome, either on the SpokaneFāVS webpage or Facebook page. Let’s talk.


All God’s blessings – Mark

Mark Azzara
Mark Azzara
Mark Azzara spent 45 years in print journalism, most of them with the Waterbury Republican in Connecticut, where he was a features writer with a special focus on religion at the time of his retirement. He also worked for newspapers in New Haven and Danbury, Conn. At the latter paper, while sports editor, he won a national first-place writing award on college baseball. Azzara also has served as the only admissions recruiter for a small Catholic college in Connecticut and wrote a self-published book on spirituality, "And So Are You." He is active in his church and facilitates two Christian study groups for men. Azzara grew up in southern California, graduating from Cal State Los Angeles. He holds a master's degree from the University of Connecticut.

Our Sponsors

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x