30.4 F
Saturday, March 2, 2024
HomeCommentaryAskAsk a Jew: What's your view of the death penalty? Part 2

Ask a Jew: What’s your view of the death penalty? Part 2


Related stories

How Alabama Supreme Court’s Ruling on Life Affects IVF

In vitro fertilization (IVF) fertility treatments are on pause in Alabama due to the perceived fear of prosecution and lawsuits in light of the Alabama Supreme Court’s ruling on Friday, Feb. 16, stating that human beings frozen in the embryonic stage have the same legal rights and protections as children who are born.

Ask a Hindu: Why Do You Not Believe in a God?

Why, as a Hindu, do you not believe in a God and everything in the universe indicates his existence?

For Lent Let’s Give Up Negativity and Replace It with Positive Action

Attitudes about Lent have changed over the decades. Instead of “giving up” something for Lent, the approach is more about growing closer to Christ in more meaningful ways.

From the Wilderness into New Life: Everyone Can Participate in Lent

Lent thus offers a cluster of possibilities: fasting — or at least giving up something for Lent; repenting; joining Jesus in a wilderness experience; and experiencing the lengthening of days. Can everyone take part?

Black History Month for White People: Racism Is Our Problem

FāVS columnist Sarah Henn Hayward explores how racism in America is a White problem and what White Americans can do about it this Black History month.

By Neal Schindler

What questions do you have about Judaism? Submit them online, or fill out the form below.

This part 2 of a series. Read part one.

How does your faith view the death penalty?

SPO_Ask-a-Jew-ad_042114Here’s what Rabbi Louis Jacobs, a major 20th-century Jewish thinker, had to say on the subject of Judaism and capital punishment: “[T]hroughout the Talmudic literature, this whole subject is viewed with unease, so much so that according to the rules stated in that literature the death penalty could hardly ever have been imposed.” He points out that rabbis of old could not have flatly prohibited capital punishment, since Leviticus 20 clearly authorizes it in some cases. Jacobs adds, however, that an “in theory, not practice” approach to the death penalty continued for centuries. In practice, safeguards were established so that people were rarely, if ever, put to death. When Israel came into being, “it was eventually decided to abolish capital punishment entirely except for treason committed in time of war.”

Maimonides, in his considerable wisdom, stated the following: “It is better and more satisfactory to acquit a thousand guilty persons than to put a single innocent one to death.” This sentiment rings as true for anti-capital punishment activists today as it must have for many people during Maimonides’ era. In light of contemporary cases in which people convicted of serious crimes are later exonerated, it shouldn’t be surprising that, according to the Pew Research Center, “[a]ll of the major Jewish movements in the United States either advocate for the abolition of the death penalty or have called for at least a temporary moratorium on its use.”

Neal Schindler
Neal Schindler
A native of Detroit, Neal Schindler has lived in the Pacific Northwest since 2002. He has held staff positions at Seattle Weekly and The Seattle Times and was a freelance writer for Jew-ish.com from 2007 to 2011. Schindler was raised in a Reconstructionist Jewish congregation and is now a member of Spokane's Reform congregation, Emanu-El. He is the director of Spokane Area Jewish Family Services. His interests include movies, Scrabble, and indie rock. He lives with his wife, son, and two cats in West Central Spokane.




0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
8 years ago

On the death penalty:

If we allow a murderer to go free (after a prison sentence), are we potentially imposing a death penalty on his next victim?

Does this make the entire question moot (a choice between executing a murderer and executing an innocent by inaction)?

Neal Schindler
Neal Schindler
8 years ago
Reply to  Reader

We can’t prosecute thoughtcrimes. Allowing a murderer to go free doesn’t guarantee he or she will or won’t kill again. But we need to decide what just punishment looks like and then, once a person has undergone it, free them. If life in prison is the punishment, then their freedom is death, I guess. But we’re not killing them, time is.

8 years ago

Thank you, Neal. Very interesting. Most Jews I’ve talked to are very uncomfortable with allowing the state the right to kill. When addressing this question we do need to take extreme precautions in order to be responsible, and get and consider many complex ramifications. Reader grossly oversimplifies, on at least two counts. First, most sentencing laws would nlt allow release of a murderer after a few years, or many years. Most of those opposed to the DP are calling for Life without the possibility of parole. And many murderers can and do undergo a change, a development or at least a hormonal change that makes them no more likely to reoffend than you r I, (I hope) average citizens. Reader, do you say a person can’t change. Do you say Life without… is not effective? It is cheaper, and more humane considering the mistakes and the socially prejudiced decisions of our legal system?

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x